Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Cortical Auditory Neural Responses to Speech and Communicative Functioning in Normocephalic Children With Prenatal Exposure to the Zika Virus.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Sensitivity to interaural phase as a function of frequency: Age effects measured with behavioral and electrophysiological tasks.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Modulation of Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids by SARS-CoV-2 Variants Across Cancer Types: A Study Combining Morphology, Inflammation, and Whole-Exome Profiling.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Minimum Audible Angle and the Acoustic Change Complex Elicited by Azimuthal Shifts in Low-Frequency Sounds: Effects of Age.

Trends in hearing·2025
Same author

Relative intensities and compositions of multifactorial peak kinematic and mechanical demands in elite youth soccer.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2025
Same author

Temporal and Spectral Cues for Phoneme Perception in School-Age Children and Adults.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Weeklong Noise Exposure of 100 College Students Who Participate in Music Activities.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Temporal Masking Assessed With Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Vívian Maynart1,2, Pedro Menezes1,2, Carlos Batista1,2

  • 1State University of Health Sciences of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.

Ear and Hearing
|June 10, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forward masking did not affect auditory evoked potentials as hypothesized. Instead, leading sounds influenced later sounds differently than traditional temporal masking effects.

Keywords:
Auditory evoked potencialsAuditory perceptionNoise

More Related Videos

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Speech Perception

Background:

  • Investigating the impact of sequential sounds on auditory processing is crucial for understanding speech perception.
  • Temporal masking, specifically forward masking, describes how a preceding sound can interfere with the perception of a subsequent sound.
  • Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) provide a measure of neural processing in response to auditory stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the effects of sequential sounds on CAEPs.
  • To investigate temporal masking, particularly forward masking, on speech-evoked potentials.
  • To test hypotheses regarding amplitude reduction and latency changes in CAEPs due to forward masking.

Main Methods:

  • CAEPs were recorded in 32 normal-hearing adults.
  • The speech sound /ba/ was presented alone or preceded by a speech-shaped noise masker.
  • Inter-stimulus intervals (Δt) of 3, 10, 32, and 100 ms were used, with masker and signal levels at 70 dB SPL and 70 dB pSPL, respectively.

Main Results:

  • The masker presence increased N1 latency and reduced N1-P2 amplitude of the /ba/-evoked CAEP.
  • These effects on latency and amplitude were not dependent on the interval (Δt) between the masker and the signal.
  • The results did not support the initial hypotheses regarding forward masking effects.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that leading sounds can influence responses to lagging sounds in CAEPs.
  • This influence appears distinct from conventional forward-masking effects, which typically show recovery functions.
  • The study indicates a unique interaction between sequential sounds in auditory cortical processing.