Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The DNA Helix01:07

The DNA Helix

Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is the genetic material responsible for passing traits from generation to generation in all organisms and most viruses. DNA is composed of two strands of nucleotides that wind around each other to form a spring-like structure called a double helix. However, the double helix is not perfectly symmetrical. Instead, there are regularly occurring grooves in the structure. The major groove occurs where the sugar-phosphate backbones are relatively far apart. This space...
The DNA Helix01:16

The DNA Helix

Overview
Single-Strand DNA Binding Proteins01:03

Single-Strand DNA Binding Proteins

For successful DNA replication, the unwinding of double-stranded DNA must be accompanied by stabilization and protection of the separated single strands of the DNA. This crucial task is performed by single-strand DNA-binding (SSB) proteins. They bind to the DNA in a sequence-independent manner, which means that the nitrogenous bases of the DNA need not be present in a specific order for binding of SSB proteins to it. The binding of SSB proteins straightens single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and makes...
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA has a double-helix structure. The...
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

Overview
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

Overview

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synthetic Peptide Antibodies via a Rational Approach Based on Disulfide-Stabilized α-Helical Peptides, for the Recognition of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein NUPR1.

Macromolecular bioscience·2025
Same author

Selection and characterization of DNA aptamers targeting the surface Borrelia protein CspZ with high-throughput cross-over SELEX.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Production, purification, and quality assessment of borrelial proteins CspZ from Borrelia burgdorferi and FhbA from Borrelia hermsii.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2024
Same author

The functionality of a therapeutic antibody candidate restored by a single mutation from proline to threonine in the variable region.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2023
Same author

Synthetic Peptide Antibodies as TNF-α Inhibitors: Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Nanogels Neutralize the Inflammatory Activity of TNF-α in THP-1 Derived Macrophages.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2023
Same author

AptaMat: a matrix-based algorithm to compare single-stranded oligonucleotides secondary structures.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2022
Same journal

Adversarial Sequence Mutations in AlphaFold and ESMFold Reveal Nonphysical Structural Invariance, Confidence Failures, and Concerns for Protein Design.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

High-Throughput Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Uncovers Hidden Molecular Networks in Biosynthetic Gene Clusters.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

A Region-Aware Structured Framework Improves Prediction of Gene Expression from DNA Methylation.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches Predict Survival in Lower-Grade Glioma Based on Glycosphingolipid Gene Expression and Metabolic Modeling.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

QeITH: Quantifies Tumor Ecosystem Heterogeneity to Predict Cancer Progression and Treatment Benefit.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

Erratum to "Exploring the universal healthy human gut microbiota around the World".

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

Predicting Single-Stranded DNA Oligonucleotides 3D Structures: An Open Issue.

Selma Bengaouer1, Thomas Binet1, Stéphane Octave1

  • 1Université de technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, UPJV, GEC, Compiègne, France.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
|June 10, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) 3D structures is crucial for biotechnology. A direct prediction tool outperformed indirect RNA-based methods, though both struggled with complex ssDNA motifs like G-quadruplexes, indicating a need for improved modeling approaches.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) are vital for biological functions and biotechnological applications due to their stability and functional foldings.
  • Understanding the 3D structures of ssDNAs is fundamental for investigating their roles and for designing novel ssDNA molecules.
  • In silico 3D structure prediction offers a powerful approach to facilitate ssDNA design and analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of existing 3D structure prediction tools for single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs).
  • To compare the accuracy of indirect methods (using RNA prediction tools) versus direct methods (using DNA-specific tools) for ssDNA modeling.
  • To identify limitations in current prediction methods, particularly for complex ssDNA structures.

Main Methods:

  • A dataset of 97 experimentally determined ssDNA structures was compiled, including challenging motifs like G-quadruplexes.
  • Three indirect RNA 3D structure prediction tools (RNAComposer, SimRNA, Vfold3D) were assessed.
  • One direct DNA prediction tool (3dDNA) was evaluated alongside the indirect methods.
  • Performance was benchmarked using metrics such as Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), Global Distance Test Total Score (GDT_TS), and Interaction Network Fidelity (INF).

Main Results:

  • Indirect RNA prediction tools demonstrated moderate and comparable performance in modeling ssDNAs.
  • The direct ssDNA prediction tool (3dDNA) generally provided superior results compared to indirect methods.
  • All evaluated tools exhibited poor performance in accurately modeling G-quadruplexes and ssDNA structures with high intrinsic flexibility.
  • Current prediction methods require improvement to account for conformational variability and specific 3D motifs in ssDNAs.

Conclusions:

  • While direct prediction tools show promise for ssDNA modeling, current methods are insufficient for accurately predicting complex structures.
  • Further advancements are necessary to enhance the prediction of ssDNA 3D structures, especially for motifs like G-quadruplexes.
  • Future research should focus on incorporating conformational variability and specific structural motifs into ssDNA 3D structure prediction algorithms.