Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

07:30
Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
Interlimb strength asymmetry is task-specific: moderate reliability but inconsistent limb dominance in multi-joint
Manfred Zöger1,2,3, Alfred Nimmerichter1,2, Arnold Baca2
1Training and Sports Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
|June 10, 2026
Summary
Interlimb strength asymmetry measures show moderate to good reliability but substantial individual variability. Limb dominance consistency is limited across different testing conditions.
Area of Science:
- Sports Medicine
- Biomechanics
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- Interlimb strength asymmetry is crucial for sports performance diagnostics.
- Reliability, velocity specificity, and limb dominance consistency in multi-joint dynamometry require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the test-retest reliability of interlimb strength asymmetry using unilateral multi-joint isometric and isokinetic dynamometry.
- To determine the consistency of limb dominance across various knee angles and contraction velocities.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-five recreationally active adults performed unilateral leg press assessments.
- Tests included isometric (100°, 140°) and isokinetic (30, 600 mm·s⁻¹) conditions across two sessions.
- Interlimb strength asymmetry and directional limb dominance were calculated and analyzed for reliability and agreement.
Main Results:
- No significant systematic differences were found between test sessions.
- Relative reliability (ICC) was moderate to good (0.55-0.84), but absolute reliability showed substantial variability (SEM 2.9%-7.5%, MDC 8.1-20.8%).
- Limb dominance agreement was fair to substantial (kappa 0.24-0.65), with only 16% showing consistent dominance.
Conclusions:
- Interlimb strength asymmetry in multi-joint dynamometry is task-specific with considerable individual variability.
- Measurement error often exceeded clinical thresholds, necessitating cautious interpretation of asymmetry values.
- Avoid universal cutoffs for return-to-sport or performance decisions due to limited dominance stability.
