Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Carbapenemases: epidemiology, detection and management in a changing global landscape
Nenad Macesic1,2, Patrick N A Harris3,4,5, Yin Mo6,7,8,9,10
1Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Level 1, Alfred Lane House, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Abstract:
Carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria are a growing threat to last-line beta-lactam (BL) therapy and are now established across Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Since the first reports in the 1980s, carbapenemase genes have disseminated internationally through plasmids, transposons and integrons and have become embedded in high-risk clones, with contemporary epidemiology dominated by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC), New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase, Verona integron-encoded, imipenemase and oxacillinase (OXA)-type enzymes. The past decade has been marked by spread beyond hospitals, rising metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) prevalence, and convergence of resistance with hypervirulence in some lineages. This Review summarizes carbapenemase classification, genetic contexts and epidemic clones. It describes regional distribution patterns alongside One Health drivers linking healthcare, community, animal and environmental reservoirs. We outline a pragmatic diagnostic framework spanning screening, confirmatory phenotypic assays, rapid lateral flow and molecular platforms, and whole genome sequencing for surveillance and outbreak investigation, emphasizing the clinical value of early mechanism identification for both infection control and targeted therapy. Treatment is reviewed in a mechanism-directed manner: newer BL/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are central for serine carbapenemases (including KPC and many OXA-48-like producers), whereas MBL producers require alternative strategies such as aztreonam-based combinations or cefiderocol. Options remain limited for carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, although sulbactam-durlobactam and pipeline agents are expanding the therapeutic landscape. We highlight the widening gap between disease burden and access to rapid diagnostics and novel therapies, particularly in high-burden low- and middle-income settings. Finally, we outline the bundled infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship interventions needed to contain transmission and preserve the effectiveness of novel agents.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Gene Regulation in Microbial Communities: Quorum Sensing
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Antimicrobial Effectiveness