Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

DeepOmicsAE: Representing Signaling Modules in Alzheimer's Disease with Deep Learning Analysis of Proteomics, Metabolomics, and Clinical Data
Published on: December 15, 2023
Machine learning for Alzheimer's disease progression under extreme class imbalance
Patrick O Akinwumi1, Meihua Qian1, Taiwo A Olorunsogbon2
1College of Education, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression using accessible data shows limited but measurable signal. Machine learning models offer a proof-of-concept for short-term risk assessment, but require external validation for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Informatics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression prediction is clinically challenging.
- Traditional methods lack prognostic insight; ML models often require costly biomarkers or are uninterpretable.
- This study explores using accessible demographic, clinical, and cognitive data for AD progression prediction with interpretable ML.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of baseline demographic, clinical, and cognitive measures in predicting short-term Alzheimer's disease progression.
- To apply interpretable machine learning methods to address extreme class imbalance in AD progression prediction.
- To assess the clinical scalability and utility of predictive models based on widely available data.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 3,240 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with 24-month follow-up.
- Training XGBoost and logistic regression models on baseline data under natural class imbalance.
- Performance evaluation using AUROC, AUPRC, calibration, and SHAP for feature importance. Sensitivity analyses included cost-sensitive learning and imputation strategies.
Main Results:
- XGBoost achieved an AUROC of 0.912 and AUPRC of 0.051; logistic regression achieved AUROC of 0.787 and AUPRC of 0.038.
- Despite exceeding baseline prevalence, precision was low, and threshold optimization led to high false-positive rates.
- SHAP analysis identified cognitive severity, functional measures, and diagnostic status as key predictors. Significant cognitive decline was confirmed over time.
Conclusions:
- Accessible baseline data provide a limited but measurable signal for short-term AD progression prediction.
- Current models serve as an early-stage proof-of-concept, not a deployable clinical tool, due to low precision and high false-positive rates.
- External validation is crucial before clinical translation of these predictive models.
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer Disease l: Introduction
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ and tau...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Alzheimer Disease ll: Pathophysiology
Dementia l: Introduction