Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

A High-Fidelity Porcine Model of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Following Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: June 6, 2025
Long-Term Outcomes From a Decade of Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation in Australia
Yashutosh Joshi1, Sarah Scheuer2, Hong Chew2
1Heart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia; Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
Heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts shows similar long-term survival and freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) compared to donation after brain death (DBD) hearts. These findings confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of DCD heart transplants.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Immunology
Background:
- Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation expands the donor pool but long-term outcomes remain uncertain.
- DCD heart donation offers excellent short-term survival, necessitating evaluation of long-term efficacy.
- Comparing DCD and DBD heart transplant outcomes is crucial for understanding long-term graft performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 10-year patient survival between DCD and DBD heart transplant recipients.
- To assess 10-year freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in DCD versus DBD heart transplant recipients.
- To establish the long-term safety and efficacy of DCD heart transplantation.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study comparing 118 DCD heart recipients with 385 DBD heart recipients.
- DCD hearts were procured using direct procurement with normothermic machine perfusion.
- DBD hearts were retrieved using static cold storage or hypothermic machine perfusion.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 10-year survival between DCD (67%) and DBD (64%) recipients.
- 10-year freedom from CAV was 61% for DCD recipients versus 41% for DBD recipients (P=0.5).
- Asystolic warm ischemic time was the sole retrieval-specific risk factor for severe primary graft dysfunction in DCD HT.
Conclusions:
- DCD heart transplant recipients demonstrate comparable 10-year survival and freedom from CAV to DBD recipients.
- These findings support the long-term safety and efficacy of DCD heart transplantation.
- DCD heart donation is a viable option for expanding the donor pool without compromising long-term outcomes.
Background:
Heart transplantation (HT) from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has successfully expanded the donor pool with excellent short-term survival outcomes, but there is uncertainty regarding long-term outcomes.
Objectives:
This study compared 10-year patient survival and freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in recipients of DCD hearts with a contemporary cohort of recipients of hearts from donation after brain death (DBD) donors.
Methods:
The study included consecutive heart transplant recipients at St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia) from the commencement of the DCD heart transplant program in July 2014 until December 2024. Outcomes for recipients of DCD hearts (n = 118) vs DBD hearts (n = 385) were compared. DCD hearts were retrieved using a direct procurement protocol with normothermic machine perfusion. DBD hearts were retrieved with either static cold storage (n = 336) or hypothermic machine perfusion (n = 49).
Results:
There were no significant differences in short- or long-term survival between DCD and DBD heart transplant recipients (1-year survival: 94% vs 88%; 10-year survival: 67% vs 64%, respectively; HR: 0.9 [95% CI: 0.5-1.4]; P = 0.5). The 10-year freedom from CAV was 61% and 41% for the DCD and DBD recipient groups, respectively (P = 0.5). There was no significant difference in the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction when comparing DCD recipients with DBD recipients (14% vs 14%, respectively). Asystolic warm ischemic time was found to be the only retrieval-specific independent risk factor for severe primary graft dysfunction in DCD HT (OR: 1.4 [95% CI: 1.1-2.0]; P = 0.03).
Conclusions:
Heart transplant recipients from DCD donors have similar survival and freedom from CAV at 10 years post HT when compared with a contemporary cohort of recipients from DBD donors. These findings establish the long-term safety and efficacy of DCD HT.
Related Concept Videos
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction

