Long-Term Outcomes From a Decade of Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation in Australia

Yashutosh Joshi1, Sarah Scheuer2, Hong Chew2

  • 1Heart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia; Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

JACC. Heart Failure
|June 10, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts shows similar long-term survival and freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) compared to donation after brain death (DBD) hearts. These findings confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of DCD heart transplants.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation expands the donor pool but long-term outcomes remain uncertain.
  • DCD heart donation offers excellent short-term survival, necessitating evaluation of long-term efficacy.
  • Comparing DCD and DBD heart transplant outcomes is crucial for understanding long-term graft performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare 10-year patient survival between DCD and DBD heart transplant recipients.
  • To assess 10-year freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in DCD versus DBD heart transplant recipients.
  • To establish the long-term safety and efficacy of DCD heart transplantation.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study comparing 118 DCD heart recipients with 385 DBD heart recipients.
  • DCD hearts were procured using direct procurement with normothermic machine perfusion.
  • DBD hearts were retrieved using static cold storage or hypothermic machine perfusion.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in 10-year survival between DCD (67%) and DBD (64%) recipients.
  • 10-year freedom from CAV was 61% for DCD recipients versus 41% for DBD recipients (P=0.5).
  • Asystolic warm ischemic time was the sole retrieval-specific risk factor for severe primary graft dysfunction in DCD HT.

Conclusions:

  • DCD heart transplant recipients demonstrate comparable 10-year survival and freedom from CAV to DBD recipients.
  • These findings support the long-term safety and efficacy of DCD heart transplantation.
  • DCD heart donation is a viable option for expanding the donor pool without compromising long-term outcomes.
Abstract