Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Surface-enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering Nanoprobe Ratiometry for Detecting Microscopic Ovarian Cancer via Folate Receptor Targeting
Published on: March 25, 2019
Nanotechnology integration in oncology for advanced nanoparticle based strategies in targeted cancer diagnosis and
Yosri A Fahim1, Ibrahim W Hasani2,3, Samer Kabba2
1Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Health Sector, Galala University, Suez, 43511, Egypt. Yosri.Fahim@gu.edu.eg.
Abstract:
Cancer remains a major global health challenge. Conventional therapies are often limited by poor tumor selectivity, systemic toxicity, multidrug resistance, and suboptimal pharmacokinetics. Nanotechnology offers a transformative approach in oncology. It enables targeted drug delivery, controlled or stimuli-responsive release, and multifunctional platforms that combine therapy and diagnostics. Nanoparticles enhance drug solubility, prolong circulation, and improve intracellular uptake. These advances are achieved through passive enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) and active targeting mechanisms. Despite robust preclinical success, clinical translation remains inconsistent. Factors such as pronounced inter- and intratumoral EPR variability, long-term toxicity or biodistribution concerns, immune recognition, and stringent regulatory or manufacturing hurdles contribute to high attrition rates. Approved nanomedicines, such as liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®) and albumin-bound paclitaxel (Abraxane®), have achieved meaningful clinical impact. Others, such as thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (ThermoDox®), have shown variable or limited benefits. This gap highlights persistent differences between promise and performance. This review critically examines nanoparticle synthesis strategies (bottom-up, top-down, microfluidic, and green methods); structural and physicochemical characterization techniques; tumor-targeting mechanisms; and major classes of organic (liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, polymeric, micelles, dendrimers), inorganic (carbon-based, metallic, silica, magnetic), and hybrid nanocarriers. Emphasis is placed on mechanistic insights, comparative performance, and translational limitations. Key issues include batch-to-batch variability, lack of standardized nanotoxicology protocols, patient-specific heterogeneity, and regulatory challenges. This review aims to guide the successful integration of nanotechnology into precision cancer therapy.
Insights
Nanotechnology shows promise for cancer therapy by improving drug delivery and targeting. However, challenges in clinical translation, including variability and toxicity, must be addressed for successful integration into precision cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology and Nanomedicine
- Biomaterials and Drug Delivery
Background:
- Conventional cancer therapies face limitations like poor tumor selectivity and systemic toxicity.
- Nanotechnology offers novel solutions for targeted drug delivery, controlled release, and combined therapy/diagnostics in oncology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically review nanoparticle synthesis, characterization, and tumor-targeting mechanisms for cancer therapy.
- To analyze the translational limitations and challenges hindering the clinical application of nanomedicines in oncology.
Main Methods:
- Examination of various nanoparticle synthesis strategies (bottom-up, top-down, microfluidic, green methods).
- Review of structural and physicochemical characterization techniques for nanocarriers.
- Analysis of passive (EPR) and active targeting mechanisms for tumor delivery.
Main Results:
- Nanoparticles enhance drug solubility, circulation time, and cellular uptake via passive and active targeting.
- Despite preclinical success, clinical translation is inconsistent due to EPR variability, toxicity, and regulatory hurdles.
- Approved nanomedicines demonstrate clinical impact, while others show variable benefits, highlighting a gap between promise and performance.
Conclusions:
- Successful integration of nanotechnology into precision cancer therapy requires addressing batch variability, nanotoxicology standardization, patient heterogeneity, and regulatory challenges.
- Further research and development are needed to overcome translational barriers and optimize nanomedicine performance in clinical settings.
- Nanotechnology holds significant potential to revolutionize cancer treatment through improved efficacy and reduced side effects.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

