Related Experiment Videos

Translational gaps in immuno-AI: From algorithmic accuracy to clinical trust

Emmanuel O Oisakede1, Raphael Igbarumah Ayo Daniel2, Olabanke Florence Olawuyi3

  • 1Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom; Department of Health Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Human Immunology
|June 10, 2026
PubMed

Artificial intelligence has shown remarkable promise in predicting patient responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors across cancers. However, despite high statistical performance, clinical translation remains minimal. This disconnect between algorithmic accuracy and clinical adoption, termed the translational gap, reflects unresolved challenges in validation, interpretability, and regulatory integration. This review critically examines key barriers preventing translation of Immuno-AI systems from research prototypes to clinically trusted decision-support tools. It analyzes methodological, regulatory, ethical, and infrastructural factors limiting implementation and proposes strategies for developing clinically trustworthy AI in immuno-oncology. A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published 2018-2025 reporting AI or machine learning models predicting ICI response or toxicity in human cohorts. Narrative synthesis was applied, focusing on translational bottlenecks. Three dominant factors underpin the translational gap: (1) insufficient external and prospective validation, leading to overestimation of model performance; (2) limited interpretability and absence of explainable frameworks suitable for clinical use; and (3) regulatory and infrastructural immaturity, including lack of harmonised standards for adaptive AI systems. These limitations contribute to absence of clinician confidence and hinder regulatory approval. Bridging the translational gap in Immuno-AI requires a shift from model-centric optimisation to system-level accountability. Clinically trustworthy AI must be validated across institutions, designed for interpretability, and governed by transparent, ethical frameworks. Collaborative efforts among researchers, clinicians, and regulators are essential to ensure future Immuno-AI systems achieve algorithmic excellence, clinical credibility, and social legitimacy.

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R stands for...