Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
Published on: June 6, 2025
Does genetic diagnosis influence long-term seizure and developmental outcomes in childhood developmental and
Prasannakumar Surabhi1, Alfiya Fasaludeen1, Manna Jose1
1R. Madhavan Nayar Center for Comprehensive Epilepsy Care, Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695011, India.
Insights
Genetic testing in childhood-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) identified genetic causes but did not predict seizure or developmental outcomes. Early development and epilepsy onset are key prognostic factors.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Clinical Genetics
- Epileptology
Background:
- Childhood-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) present significant challenges in predicting long-term outcomes.
- The role of genetic diagnosis in influencing the trajectory of these complex neurological disorders remains an area of active investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate long-term seizure and developmental outcomes in children with DEE of presumed genetic origin.
- To determine if a genetic diagnosis impacts the electroclinical course and prognosis of DEE.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 255 children with seizure onset before 12 years diagnosed with DEE was conducted.
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed, with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up.
- Outcomes including seizure freedom, reduction, and developmental status were compared between genetically diagnosed and undiagnosed children.
Main Results:
- A genetic diagnosis was achieved in 43.5% of cases, associated with earlier seizure onset and lower likelihood of independent ambulation.
- Seizure freedom occurred in 40.4% and was not influenced by genetic testing status.
- Predictors of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) included initial delayed development, while predictors of adverse developmental outcomes included prior psychomotor delay, early epilepsy onset, and milestone regression.
Conclusions:
- Genetic diagnosis in DEE is linked to earlier onset and functional impairment but does not independently predict long-term seizure or developmental outcomes.
- Pre-existing neurodevelopmental status and the timing of epilepsy onset are the primary determinants of prognosis.
- Integrating genetic testing with early clinical recognition, seizure management, and developmental interventions is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Objective:
To evaluate long-term seizure and developmental outcomes of childhood-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) of presumed genetic etiology and to determine whether genetic diagnosis influences the electroclinical trajectory.
Methods:
We conducted a cohort study on children with seizure onset before 12 years diagnosed with DEE who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) and had ≥1 year of follow-up. Outcomes compared included seizure freedom, seizure reduction and developmental status at last follow-up between children with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and those with negative genetic test results. Clinical predictors of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and adverse developmental outcome were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.
Results:
Among 255 children (median follow-up 5 years), a genetic diagnosis was made in 111 (43.5%). Positive genetic results were significantly associated with younger age at seizure onset (p < 0.001) and lower likelihood of independent ambulation (p = 0.008). Seizure freedom was achieved in 40.4% overall and was not deteremined by genetic test status. On multivariate analysis, predictors of DRE were initial delayed development (Odds ratio-OR 1.87; 95%; p = 0.021) and negative family history of seizures (OR-0.55; p = 0.029). Predictors of adverse developmental outcome were psychomotor delay prior to seizure onset (OR-2.91; p < 0.001), early age of onset of epilepsy (OR-2.15; p = 0.015) and regression of milestones (OR4.13; p < 0.001). Genetic test positivity did not emerge as an independent predictor of seizure freedom or developmental outcome. Syndrome-specific analyses revealed higher possibility of DRE in genetically confirmed Dravet syndrome.
Significance:
In our large longitudinal cohort, genetic diagnosis was associated with earlier epilepsy onset and functional impairment but did not independently predict long-term seizure or developmental outcomes. Prior neurodevelopmental status and epilepsy-onset timing remain the strongest determinants of prognosis, underscoring the need to integrate genetic testing with early clinical recognition, aggressive seizure management and timely developmental interventions.
More Related Videos
09:57Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
Published on: September 20, 2024
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Epilepsy and Seizures: Overview
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Epilepsy ll: Types
Seizures: Classification
Seizures are typically classified into two main categories: focal and generalized seizures.
Focal Seizures
Focal seizures originate from specific regions of the brain. These seizures are further sub-classified into two types:
Seizures l: Introduction