Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Phase angle and standardized phase angle as predictors of 5-year survival in hemodialysis patients
Mar Ruperto1, Martín Giorgi2, Borja Quiroga3
1Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; Department of Pharmaceutical & Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Boazzzzdilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ISS-Princesa), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Objective:
Determine the cut-offs for the phase angle (PhA) and standardized phase angle (SPhA) and evaluate their usefulness as survival predictors in hemodialysis (HD) patients.
Methods:
A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a cohort of 140 HD patients, jointly evaluating clinical, nutritional, and body composition measurements. PhA and SPhA were measured using bioelectrical impedance. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to identify the optimal cutoff values for PhA and SPhA. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed the ability of PhA and SPhA to predict 5-year overall survival.
Results:
Of the 140 HD patients, 65 were male (46.5%), median age of 74 years (range, 58-91). Higher PhA was in survivors (4.55 ± 0.93) than in non-survivors (3.97 ± 0.99) (P < 0.002). The optimal PhA cutoff was 4° (sensitivity: 73.58%; specificity: 64.71%; AUC: 0.686), and for the SPhA was -1.89 (sensitivity: 75.47%; specificity: 64.71%; AUC: 0.654) (both, P < 0.001). The mortality rate for PhA was 24.3%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 88.0%, 66.0%, and 57.0%, respectively. HD patients with SPhA values of at least -1.89 had an overall 5-year survival rate of 60.0% (P = 0.001). Cox-regression analysis demonstrated that PhA (HR:2.915, 95%CI: 1.561-5.444; P < 0.001) and SPhA (HR: 3.106, 95%CI: 1.655- 5.829; P < 0.001) were predictors of 5-year overall survival in HD.
Conclusions:
PhA and SPhA are clinically useful and predict 5-year survival in HD patients. The PhA cutoff of 4° and the SPhA cutoff of -1.89 were sensitive markers for detecting PEW in HD. SPhA may be a more effective nutritional predictor of overall survival than PhA alone. Further research is needed to validate the predictive value of SPhA.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Cancer Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
