Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Intra-Operative Neural Monitoring of Thyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model
Published on: February 11, 2019
Timing of a single dexmedetomidine bolus to attenuate remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia after thyroidectomy: a
Xue Han1,2,3, Wen Xu1,2, Su Wang1,2
1Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No.99 Huaihai West Road, Xuzhou, 221001, Jiangsu, China.
Background:
Remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) is a frequent postoperative complication. Dexmedetomidine can attenuate RIH, but whether the effect depends on the timing of administration remains unclear. The study compared two clinically relevant timings of a single dexmedetomidine bolus in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.
Methods:
A total of 118 patients were randomized into three groups: Group I (dexmedetomidine before anesthesia induction), Group R (dexmedetomidine at skin closure), and Group C (control). The primary outcome was the mechanical pain threshold measured on the dominant forearm at 30 min postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included peri-incisional pain threshold, pain intensity, QoR-15 recovery score, hemodynamic stability, and adverse events.
Results:
Mechanical pain thresholds at 30 min postoperatively were significantly higher in Groups I and R than in Group C. Only Group R showed a lower incidence of peri-incisional hyperalgesia at 24 h (P = 0.004). Resting pain scores, rescue analgesic use, and QoR-15 total scores were comparable among groups. Compared with Group I, Group R showed a more favorable intraoperative hemodynamic profile and a lower ephedrine requirement, but longer times to eye-opening and extubation.
Conclusions:
In adults aged 18-65 years undergoing thyroidectomy, a single dexmedetomidine bolus administered at skin closure was associated with improved quantitative sensory testing-derived measures of mechanical hyperalgesia, including a lower incidence of peri-incisional hyperalgesia at 24 h. However, these sensory-threshold findings were not accompanied by lower resting pain scores, reduced rescue analgesic use, or improved QoR-15 recovery scores. Therefore, the results should be interpreted primarily as evidence of an antihyperalgesic effect measured by mechanical sensory testing rather than as proof of a clinically established analgesic benefit. Further studies incorporating movement-evoked pain and broader patient populations are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.
Trial Registration:
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300071038, registered 30 April 2023.
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview