Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Measuring Spatially- and Directionally-varying Light Scattering from Biological Material
Published on: May 20, 2013
Accuracy comparison of spatial brightness evaluation metrics under indirect lighting conditions
None:
Among existing spatial brightness (SB) metrics, mean room surface exitance (MRSE), average luminance in a horizontal band with a width of 40°(Lav,B40), and indirect corneal illuminance (Ecor,i) have received extensive attention. However, these metrics employ fundamentally different weighting strategies for contributions of light from various spatial regions, making it important to directly compare their accuracy. This study recruited 36 participants and employed four classical psychophysical methods recommended in CIE 212:2014 to evaluate the performance of the three metrics under controlled indirect lighting scenes with different spatial light distributions. Results consistently showed that the Ecor,i metric aligned most closely with subjective SB evaluations and achieved higher accuracy than the MRSE and Lav,B40 metrics. Moreover, lighting distributions closer to the center of the visual field were found to carry a higher weight in SB perception, a characteristic effectively captured by the Ecor,i. These findings provide empirical evidence for the potential advantage of Ecor,i over MRSE and Lav,B40 in reflecting subjective SB perception under the indirect lighting conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Flame Photometry: Overview
Flame Photometry: Lab
Light Acquisition
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparison Tests
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

