Related Experiment Videos
Performance of predictive scores for in-hospital mortality in surgical infective endocarditis: a retrospective cohort
Paula Ximena Pavia-Velandia1, Paula Liliana Torres-Gómez2, Nicolás Molano-González3
1Institute of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Méderi Research Center (CIMED), Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Background:
Infective endocarditis (IE) carries high surgical mortality, particularly in Latin American populations where validated prediction models are scarce. Although EuroSCORE II, RISK-E, and APORTEI have shown acceptable performance in European cohorts, external validation in middle-income country settings remains limited.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery for IE at a high-complexity tertiary-care center in Bogotá, Colombia, between 2014 and 2025. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed using Harrell's C-statistic and calibration was assessed via intercept, slope, Spiegelhalter's z-test, Brier score, mean absolute error (Eavg), and maximum absolute error (Emax).
Results:
Seventy patients were included (mean age 51.9 ± 14.8 years; 70% male); in-hospital mortality was 30% (21/70). RISK-E demonstrated the highest discrimination (C = 0.741, 95% CI 0.61-0.85), followed by EuroSCORE II (C = 0.718, 95% CI 0.58-0.83) and APORTEI (C = 0.676, 95% CI 0.53-0.80). All three scores systematically underestimated mortality risk, as evidenced by positive calibration intercepts (range 1.14-1.75). Calibration was closest to ideal for RISK-E (slope=0.962), while APORTEI showed the greatest deviation (slope=1.425). Spiegelhalter's z-test indicated significant miscalibration for all three models (all p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
RISK-E showed numerically superior discrimination and a calibration slope closest to unity, although pairwise DeLong's tests showed no statistically significant difference between any two scores, and these findings should be interpreted in the context of the limited sample size (70 patients, 21 events). All three scores systematically underestimated in-hospital mortality, suggesting that recalibration or development of locally derived models is needed for reliable risk stratification in Latin American IE surgical programs.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...