Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
Incorporation of a Survivable Liver Biopsy Procedure in Mice to Assess Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Resolution
Published on: April 16, 2019
Clinical evidence of semaglutide for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): An updated
Tzu-Rong Peng1,2,3, Hung-Hong Lin4, Tzu-Ling Tseng3,5,6
1Department of Pharmacy, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Background:
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are major health burdens. Previous reviews of semaglutide found inconsistent fibrosis improvement. This study aims to provide updated evidence on the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in MASH through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods:
Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420261288562), we searched databases through 8 January 2026. Ten studies (n = 1908) were analysed. Primary outcomes were histological MASH resolution and fibrosis improvement; secondary outcomes included liver stiffness and biochemical markers.
Results:
Semaglutide significantly improved MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis (OR 3.48; 95% CI: 2.68-4.53; p < .00001). However, pooled fibrosis improvement (≥1 stage) was not statistically significant (OR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.49-2.80; p = .72). Radiologically, semaglutide reduced liver stiffness (MD -1.25 kPa; 95% CI: -2.18 to -0.32; p = .009) and increased relative liver fat reduction of ≥30% (OR 7.16; 95% CI: 3.08-16.64; p < .00001). Significant reductions in AST, ALT and cholesterol were also observed. Regarding safety, semaglutide was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal-related adverse events (RR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.20-2.79) compared with the control group, but no significant difference was observed in the risk of serious adverse events (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.82-1.39).
Conclusion:
Semaglutide effectively resolves steatohepatitis and improves biochemical and imaging markers. However, its anti-fibrotic efficacy appears stage-dependent and time-dependent, with significant histological reversal primarily observed in non-cirrhotic stages within current trial durations.
