Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Antibody Binding Specificity for Kappa (Vκ) Light Chain-containing Human (IgM) Antibodies: Polysialic Acid (PSA) Attached to NCAM as a Case Study
Published on: June 29, 2016
Isotype cross-reactivity of anti-porcine IgG and IgA reagents
Gitte Erbs1, Jeanne Toft Jakobsen1, Sylvia Crossley2
1Department of Infectious Disease Immunology, Center for Vaccine Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Reliable assessment of vaccine induced antibody responses depends on the specificity and validation of immunological reagents, however, many commercially available antibodies remain insufficiently validated and may exhibit substantial off target binding. This limitation is particularly relevant for isotype specific analyses, where cross reactivity can profoundly affect data interpretation. In this study, we examined serum IgA responses following vaccination in pigs using two different commercially available polyclonal anti-porcine IgA antibodies and evaluated their specificity against monoclonal antibody-based assays and recombinant immunoglobulin isotypes. Initial analyses using a widely applied polyclonal antibody showed IgA response kinetics closely resembling IgG responses, though at lower titers, consistent with numerous previous reports. The unexpectedly similar half-lives of serum IgA and IgG prompted us to test an alternative polyclonal antibody, which revealed only transient IgA responses detectable one week after immunization. This short-lived IgA response was independently confirmed using a biotinylated monoclonal antibody ELISA specific for porcine IgA. Correlation analyses across all time points, together with direct binding assays employing isotype-switched monoclonal antibodies and recombinantly produced porcine immunoglobin isotypes, demonstrated pronounced cross reactivity between one commercial anti-IgA polyclonal antibody and porcine IgG, and a cross reactivity of both commercial anti-IgG polyclonal antibodies, which showed comparable levels of detection of IgA as the IgA-specific polyclonal antibodies. Collectively, these findings demonstrate a critical lack of specificity in commonly used polyclonal secondary antibodies for porcine IgA and IgG detection. Importantly, antibody choice fundamentally alters the interpretation of antibody isotype responses, highlighting the need for rigorous validation of immunological reagents in both preclinical vaccine research and infectious disease immunopathology studies.
Reliable assessment of vaccine induced antibody responses depends on the specificity and validation of immunological reagents, however, many commercially available antibodies remain insufficiently validated and may exhibit substantial off target binding. This limitation is particularly relevant for isotype specific analyses, where cross reactivity can profoundly affect data interpretation. In this study, we examined serum IgA responses following vaccination in pigs using two different commercially available polyclonal anti-porcine IgA antibodies and evaluated their specificity against monoclonal antibody-based assays and recombinant immunoglobulin isotypes. Initial analyses using a widely applied polyclonal antibody showed IgA response kinetics closely resembling IgG responses, though at lower titers, consistent with numerous previous reports. The unexpectedly similar half-lives of serum IgA and IgG prompted us to test an alternative polyclonal antibody, which revealed only transient IgA responses detectable one week after immunization. This short-lived IgA response was independently confirmed using a biotinylated monoclonal antibody ELISA specific for porcine IgA. Correlation analyses across all time points, together with direct binding assays employing isotype-switched monoclonal antibodies and recombinantly produced porcine immunoglobin isotypes, demonstrated pronounced cross reactivity between one commercial anti-IgA polyclonal antibody and porcine IgG, and a cross reactivity of both commercial anti-IgG polyclonal antibodies, which showed comparable levels of detection of IgA as the IgA-specific polyclonal antibodies. Collectively, these findings demonstrate a critical lack of specificity in commonly used polyclonal secondary antibodies for porcine IgA and IgG detection. Importantly, antibody choice fundamentally alters the interpretation of antibody isotype responses, highlighting the need for rigorous validation of immunological reagents in both preclinical vaccine research and infectious disease immunopathology studies.
More Related Videos
06:15Characterization of Thymus-dependent and Thymus-independent Immunoglobulin Isotype Responses in Mice Using Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Published on: September 7, 2018
09:12A Protein Microarray Assay for Serological Determination of Antigen-specific Antibody Responses Following Clostridium difficile Infection
Published on: June 15, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cross-reactivity
Antibody Structure
Antibodies, also known as immunoglobulins (Ig), are essential players of the adaptive immune system. These antigen-binding proteins are produced by B cells and make up 20 percent of the total blood plasma by weight. In mammals, antibodies fall into five different classes, which each elicits a different biological response upon antigen binding.
The Y-Shaped Structure of Antibodies Consists of Four Polypeptide Chains
Antibodies consist of four polypeptide chains: two identical heavy...
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
These...