Mechanical Thrombectomy for M2 versus M1 Occlusions: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Severity-Stratified

Matthew M Zidan1, Hanna Zimmermann2, Helge Kniep2

  • 1From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (M.M.Z., S.O., C.G., A.R., F.D.), Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology (H.Z., F.D.), LMU-Klinikum der Universität München Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Munich, Germany and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (H.K., J.F.), University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany. mousa.zidan@ukbonn.de.

Abstract

Insights

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for M2 occlusions shows better outcomes than M1, especially in severe strokes. Early neurological improvement (ENI) predicts good results in M2 occlusions, suggesting MT benefits may be concentrated in specific patient groups.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Interventional Neurology
  • Stroke Medicine

Background:

  • Recent trials on endovascular therapy (EVT) for medium-vessel occlusions had neutral results.
  • This may be due to including patients with mild deficits and relying solely on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS).
  • Propensity score matching (PSM) can help compare outcomes between different occlusion types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare mechanical thrombectomy (MT) outcomes between M1 and M2 medium-vessel occlusions using PSM.
  • To investigate the association of early neurological improvement (ENI) with functional outcomes in M1 versus M2 occlusions.
  • To identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from MT in medium-vessel occlusions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study using the Top-Gear imaging repository.
  • Included patients with isolated M1 or M2 occlusions undergoing EVT.
  • Used PSM based on age, sex, pre-stroke mRS, NIHSS, IV tPA, and recanalization passes; primary outcome was 90-day mRS ≤2.

Main Results:

  • After PSM, M2 occlusions showed significantly higher rates of good outcomes (51.9% vs. 30.8%, p=0.04) and lower mortality (19.3% vs. 38.5%, p=0.05).
  • M2 occlusion was independently associated with favorable outcomes (OR 2.32, p=0.04).
  • ENI was common in moderate-to-severe M2 strokes (65.6%-75%) and associated with good outcomes (64.5% mRS ≤2), unlike in M1 occlusions (33.3% mRS ≤2).

Conclusions:

  • M2 occlusion location is independently associated with favorable outcomes after MT, particularly in patients with moderate-to-severe deficits (NIHSS ≥6).
  • ENI predicts good functional outcomes in M2 occlusions but not M1 occlusions.
  • MT benefit in M2 occlusions may be concentrated in patients with NIHSS ≥6, a group potentially underrepresented in prior RCTs.

Related Concept Videos