Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

13:35
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
Published on: March 21, 2021
Agreement Between Semi-Automated CT-Based Body Composition Software and Qualitative Muscle Assessment in Sarcopenia:
Ahmet Gazi Acar1, Hatice Tuba Sanal2
1Department of Radiology, Sincan Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. g.acar353@gmail.com.
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
|June 11, 2026
Summary
Two CT software tools for body composition analysis show high agreement in measuring muscle and fat. However, they are not interchangeable for sarcopenia assessment in cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Oncology
Background:
- Body composition analysis using CT scans is crucial for assessing sarcopenia in cancer patients.
- Semi-automated software tools offer potential for efficient quantitative analysis of muscle and adipose tissue.
- Qualitative muscle assessment (Goutallier classification) is commonly used but subjective.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare quantitative body composition parameters from two semi-automated CT software tools (CoreSlicer and AsanJ-Morphometry).
- To evaluate the association between quantitative muscle/adipose tissue measures and qualitative muscle assessment (Goutallier classification).
- To assess the reliability and interchangeability of the two software tools for sarcopenia evaluation in patients with abdominal malignancies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 103 patients with abdominal malignancies undergoing CT scans.
- Independent measurement of L3 body composition parameters (TAMA, SMI, psoas area, VAT, SAT) using CoreSlicer and AsanJ-Morphometry.
- Qualitative muscle assessment via Goutallier classification; agreement assessed using ICC and Bland-Altman analysis.
Main Results:
- High agreement was found between CoreSlicer and AsanJ-Morphometry for all quantitative muscle and adipose tissue parameters.
- Higher Goutallier grades correlated significantly with lower muscle density and reduced muscle area.
- Quantitative measurements showed strong consistency with qualitative muscle assessment.
Conclusions:
- Semi-automated CT-based body composition software provides reliable quantitative data with high inter-tool agreement.
- Systematic differences exist between the software tools, limiting their interchangeability for sarcopenia assessment.
- Combining quantitative and qualitative muscle evaluation may enhance clinical sarcopenia assessment in cancer patients.

