Composting Dynamics, Bedding Properties, and Seasonal Effects in Composting and Non-Composting Bedded-Pack Barns in a...

This study investigated the effects of construction design and seasonal climatic conditions on bedding dynamics in bedded-pack dairy systems with contrasting composting functionality. The study intentionally included systems representing both composting bedded-pack barns (CBP), characterized by active management (regular turning and ventilation), and non-composting bedded-pack barns (BPB), which lacked aeration and did not promote active composting, resulting in limited or absent composting activity. Nine farms were divided into three groups: CONV (large, full-time CBP), ADAP (adapted, full-time CBP), and PART (partially used BPB). Evaluations were conducted during both cold and hot seasons. Composting dynamics were assessed over 24 h by measuring bedding temperature and moisture at eight points. During daytime, additional measurements at twenty points allowed for spatial distribution analysis using the inverse distance weighting method. Bedding attributes-including pH, density, depth, and particle size-were also measured in eight points. A 2 × 3 factorial design (two seasons, three barn types) was applied, and data were analyzed using Tukey's test and Pearson correlation. Microclimate conditions were monitored through air temperature and humidity. Bedding temperature was significantly higher in the hot season (36.55 °C) compared to the cold season (32.12 °C), and was highest in the ADAP group (40.01 °C), followed by CONV (37.39 °C) and PART (26.18 °C) (p < 0.05). The 24 h temperature curve indicated favorable composting conditions only in the CONV and ADAP groups. Spatial temperature distribution varied significantly across locations in most barns (p < 0.05). Moisture content was lower in the hot season (46.91% and 41.41%) than in the cold season (57.03% and 51.97%) for CONV and ADAP, respectively. Moisture and temperature were significantly correlated with key bedding characteristics (p ≤ 0.05). Overall, a greater combination of characteristics associated with more favorable composting conditions was observed in ADAP barns, particularly during the hot season, whereas PART systems showed conditions incompatible with active composting.