FGFR3 Alterations and Nectin-4 Expression as Therapeutic Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and

Petar Antonov1, Gabriela Raycheva2, Denis Eshrefov1

  • 1Department of Urology and General Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Insights

This study analyzed 14 bladder cancer studies, finding 52% with Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations and 78% with nectin-4 expression. Prevalence varied by disease stage and study design, requiring cautious interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Bladder cancer is molecularly diverse, with targeted therapies for Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations and nectin-4 expression.
  • The integrated clinical and biological significance of FGFR3 alterations and nectin-4 expression in bladder cancer remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and pool the prevalence of FGFR3 alterations and nectin-4 expression in bladder cancer.
  • To investigate factors influencing the prevalence estimates of these biomarkers.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to February 22, 2026.
  • Inclusion of 14 studies (3 randomized, 11 observational) with 3955 patients.
  • Pooled prevalence calculation using random-effects models; heterogeneity assessed with I² and Cochran's Q.

Main Results:

  • Pooled prevalence of FGFR3 alterations was 52% (I²=99%); nectin-4 expression was 78% (I²=91%).
  • FGFR3 prevalence varied significantly by disease stage (higher in advanced/metastatic disease) and study design (higher in randomized trials).
  • Nectin-4 expression was generally high, but limited by study numbers and assay variability; substantial heterogeneity noted.

Conclusions:

  • Prevalence estimates are influenced by study design, biomarker selection, and assay variability, limiting interpretation as true biological prevalence.
  • Results should be interpreted cautiously as descriptive, not definitive.
  • Separate analyses of biomarker-enriched trials and unselected cohorts are needed for clinically meaningful estimates.

Related Concept Videos