Combination Immunotherapy and Yttrium-90 Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Biological Rationale,...

Background/Objectives: The integration of locoregional and systemic therapies represents a promising strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization provides durable local tumor control, while immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve systemic disease outcomes. This review evaluates the biological rationale, clinical evidence, and emerging role of combination Y-90 radioembolization and immunotherapy in HCC. Methods: A semi-systematic (PRISMA-informed) literature review of PubMed/MEDLINE through September 2025 was conducted, including clinical trials, retrospective and prospective studies, and translational investigations evaluating Y-90 radioembolization, immunotherapy, and their combination. Results: Preclinical and translational studies demonstrate that Y-90 radioembolization induces immunogenic cell death, enhances antigen presentation, and activates immune pathways including interferon signaling and STING-mediated responses, supporting a mechanistic basis for potential synergy with ICIs. Early clinical studies, including phase I/II trials, report objective response rates ranging from approximately 30% to 41.5% and median overall survival up to 20.9 months in selected populations. Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events range from 10% to 25%, comparable to monotherapy approaches. However, outcomes vary across heterogeneous patient populations, and cross-trial comparisons remain limited. Ongoing prospective trials are evaluating combination strategies incorporating contemporary first-line regimens, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and the STRIDE regimen. Conclusions: Combination Y-90 radioembolization and immunotherapy demonstrates a strong biological rationale and encouraging early clinical signals, with acceptable safety profiles. However, current evidence remains preliminary and derived from non-randomized studies. Ongoing randomized trials are required to define optimal patient selection, treatment timing, and sequencing, and to establish whether combination therapy provides meaningful benefit over current standards of care.