Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Case Study for a Research Capacity Building Initiative for Community-Based Organizations
María Eugenia Contreras-Pérez1, Michelle M Hospital2, Melissa Howard3
1postdoctoral associate at the Rutgers Addiction Research Center at Rutgers University.
The Community Research Enhancement Grant (CREG) program was redesigned using a feedback-driven approach to better support community-based organizations in health disparities research. This iterative process ensures research capacity building initiatives align with evolving community needs.
Area of Science:
- Community-engaged research
- Health disparities research
- Research capacity building
Background:
- The Research Center in Minority Institutions (FIU-RCMI) focuses on health disparities research and training.
- Community-based organizations (CBOs) are key partners in addressing health inequities.
- Existing funding mechanisms may not fully meet the capacity-building needs of CBOs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the development and modification of the Community Research Enhancement Grant (CREG) program.
- To illustrate how the CREG initiative was adapted to meet the evolving needs of local CBOs.
- To highlight the importance of stakeholder feedback in designing research capacity-building programs.
Main Methods:
- The 2023 CREG funding cycle was restructured using Cooke's (2005) four-stage Research Capacity Building (RCB) framework.
- The program was reconceptualized as a capacity-building opportunity based on feedback from previous awardees.
- An iterative feedback process involving diverse stakeholders was employed.
Main Results:
- The CREG initiative was successfully modified to better serve the needs of local CBOs.
- Reconceptualizing CREG as a capacity-building opportunity enhanced its effectiveness.
- The restructured program demonstrated alignment with community and researcher needs.
Conclusions:
- An iterative feedback process is crucial for developing effective research capacity-building initiatives.
- Adapting programs based on stakeholder input ensures relevance and impact.
- This approach strengthens community-engaged research partnerships and outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Case Studies
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
