Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

In vitro Quantitative Imaging Assay for Phagocytosis of Dead Neuroblastoma Cells by iPSC-Macrophages
Published on: February 14, 2021
Metabolic Intervention with Dimethyl Malonate Impairs Phagocytic Clearance but Fails to Protect Neurons
Rachel McNeel1, Francisco M Nadal-Nicolás1,2, Kirsten Overdahl3
1National Eye Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract:
Secondary degeneration following optic nerve crush (ONC) is driven in part by mitochondrial dysfunction and microglial activation. Inspired by hibernation, where reduced succinate oxidation limits reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, we tested whether pharmacological inhibition of this pathway confers neuroprotection. Using in vivo ONC models and in vitro microglial assays, we evaluated the effects of dimethyl malonate (DMM), an inhibitor of succinate dehydrogenase, and a cell-permeable succinate analog (succinate-NV). Succinate-NV increased pro-inflammatory cytokine expression (IL-1β) and reduced anti-inflammatory IL-10, whereas non-permeable succinate had no effect, indicating that intracellular succinate can drive microglial activation. In hibernating animals, succinate-NV disrupted neuroprotection and reduced retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival following optic nerve injury. Although DMM partially reduced select inflammatory cytokines, it failed to normalize IL-1β or IL-10 and suppressed microglial phagocytosis while exhibiting cytotoxic effects. In vivo, DMM-treated animals showed reduced IBA1 microglia but increased CD68 activation and accumulation of DAPI cells at 7 days post-injury at the crush site. RGC somas persisted but were Caspase3+ consistent with impaired clearance. Astrocyte reactivity increased at lesion borders, while reduced and fragmented GFAP at the lesion site indicated localized astrocyte loss. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that inhibition of succinate oxidation alone is insufficient for neuroprotection and underscore the need for coordinated metabolic and immune regulation that cannot be achieved through single-pathway pharmacological intervention.
Insights
Targeting succinate oxidation alone does not protect retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve injury. Coordinated metabolic and immune regulation is crucial for neuroprotection, not single-pathway interventions.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Mitochondrial Biology
- Immunology
Background:
- Secondary degeneration after optic nerve crush (ONC) involves mitochondrial dysfunction and microglial activation.
- Hibernation research suggests reduced succinate oxidation may limit reactive oxygen species (ROS) and offer neuroprotection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if inhibiting succinate oxidation via dimethyl malonate (DMM) or using a succinate analog (succinate-NV) confers neuroprotection following ONC.
- To explore the role of intracellular succinate in microglial activation and its impact on retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival.
Main Methods:
- Utilized in vivo ONC models and in vitro microglial assays.
- Administered DMM (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) and succinate-NV (cell-permeable succinate analog).
- Assessed microglial activation (IL-1β, IL-10, phagocytosis), RGC survival, astrocyte reactivity, and cell death markers (Caspase3, DAPI).
Main Results:
- Succinate-NV increased pro-inflammatory IL-1β and decreased anti-inflammatory IL-10, indicating intracellular succinate drives microglial activation.
- DMM partially reduced some inflammatory cytokines but failed to normalize IL-1β/IL-10, suppressed microglial phagocytosis, and showed cytotoxicity.
- In vivo, DMM treatment led to increased CD68+ microglia, DAPI+ cell accumulation, Caspase3+ RGCs, and altered astrocyte reactivity, suggesting impaired clearance and localized damage.
Conclusions:
- Pharmacological inhibition of succinate oxidation alone is insufficient for neuroprotection after ONC.
- Effective neuroprotection requires coordinated metabolic and immune regulation, which cannot be achieved by targeting single pathways.
