Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Examining the Impact of Trial Length on Detecting Medication Effects for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Meta-Regression
Malia A Belnap1,2, Katie Witkiewitz3,4, Joseph P Schacht5
1Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Background:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends a minimum duration of 6 months for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD). The relationship between trial length and treatment effects is not well understood. The current study conducted meta-regression analyses of RCTs for AUD to examine the association between trial length and observed medication effect sizes in clinical trials.
Methods:
This secondary data analysis utilized data from a systematic literature review that identified 139 pharmacotherapy RCTs for AUD conducted between 1985 and 2023. Meta-regressions were conducted using the metafor package in R to examine whether shorter (< 12 weeks) or longer (> 12 weeks) trials differed in observed medication effect sizes for abstinence- and drinking-based endpoints, relative to 12-week trials, which represented the median trial duration. Publication bias was addressed using a weight-function model.
Results:
For abstinence-based endpoints, neither shorter (< 12 weeks; β = 0.13, SE = 0.21, p = 0.54) nor longer (> 12 weeks; β = 0.11, SE = 0.11, p = 0.30) trials differed significantly from the 12-week reference group in observed medication effect sizes. Similarly, for drinking-based endpoints, neither shorter (< 12 weeks; β = -0.07, SE = 0.09, p = 0.39) nor longer (> 12 weeks; β = 0.06, SE = 0.05, p = 0.26) trials differed significantly from 12-week trials in observed medication effect sizes. All results remained nonsignificant after adjusting for publication bias. In sensitivity analyses restricted to trials with statistically significant effect sizes, trials > 12 weeks showed smaller estimated treatment effects compared to trials ≤ 12 weeks.
Conclusions:
Observed medication effect sizes did not differ significantly across trial lengths for abstinence and drinking-based endpoints, except for analyses restricted to trials with significant effect sizes, where there was an advantage for trials that were 12 weeks or shorter. These findings inform efforts to optimize AUD RCT design.
More Related Videos
08:36The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
07:31Murine Drinking Models in the Development of Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholism: Drinking in the Dark and Two-bottle Choice
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Longitudinal Research
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches