Evaluating respiratory syncytial virus immunization strategies for infants in Canada: A cost-utility analysis

Gebremedhin B Gebretekle1, Marie Lan1,2, Min Xi1,3

  • 1Centre for Immunization Surveillance and Programs, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Plos One
|June 12, 2026
PubMed

Insights

A seasonal combination program using RSVpreF vaccine and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for high-risk infants is the most cost-effective way to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Canada. Broader infant immunization may be viable with lower prices or higher disease burden.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Public Health
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant cause of infant respiratory illness and hospitalization in Canada.
  • New prevention options like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and maternal vaccines exist, but optimal program cost-effectiveness is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various seasonal RSV prevention strategies for Canadian infants.
  • To identify the most economically viable immunization program from both health system and societal perspectives.

Main Methods:

  • Updated a Canadian cost-utility model to assess seven RSV prevention strategies.
  • Utilized a one-year time horizon with lifetime mortality impacts, estimating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY.
  • Primary analysis used product list prices, with a $50,000/QALY threshold.

Main Results:

  • A seasonal combination program (RSVpreF for in-season pregnancies, mAb for high-risk infants) was most cost-effective (ICER $35,408/QALY).
  • Expanding mAb to moderate-risk or all infants was less cost-effective.
  • Universal infant protection strategies were not cost-effective under current pricing.

Conclusions:

  • The optimal strategy involves RSVpreF for in-season pregnancies and mAb for high-risk infants, offering the best value for RSV prevention in Canada.
  • Wider infant immunization programs could become cost-effective with reduced prices or in areas with higher disease burden and healthcare costs.
Abstract