Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Comparison of four attenuation-compensation methods for backscatter coefficient estimation and characterization of
Arnaud Héroux1,2, François Destrempes1, Iman Rafati1
1Laboratory of Biorheology and Medical Ultrasonics, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Abstract:
Objective.To compare four attenuation-compensation methods for backscatter coefficient (BSC) estimation, assessment of contrast, and classification of focal liver lesions (FLL).Approach. Ninety-seven patients with 100 FLL were scanned to collect radiofrequency ultrasound images. BSC methods relied on a reference phantom for system and operator-settings independent estimations. Method #1 employeda prioritissue layer segmentation and documented attenuation coefficients (AC) of each layer. Method #2 used a fixed total AC (0.85 dB/cm/MHz). Method #3 used local AC compensation. Method #4 jointly estimated total AC and BSC with a power law frequency model (bfη). BSC@3 MHz,b,η, total AC slope, and total AC were computed within segmented lesions. Lesion contrast was assessed with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and classification performances were evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The composite clinical reference standard was a combination of MRI and histopathology.Main results.The study included 30 primary and 26 secondary cancers, and 44 benign nodules. Parameterbprovided the highest CNRs among BSC parameters (p< 0.0001) and gave higher CNRs than B-mode images (p< 0.0001). Method #3 was unsuitable with out-of-range values. Methods #1, #2, and #4 showed no significant differences forb,η, total AC slope, and total AC, whereas BSC@3 MHz showed overestimations with Method #4 compared with Methods #1 and #2 (p< 0.001 andp< 0.0001, respectively). For differentiating benign and malignant lesions,ηprovided the highest AUC of 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-0.82). For differentiating primary and secondary cancers, BSC@3 MHz provided the highest AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.55-0.83). Classification AUCs did not differ between Methods #1, #2 and #4.Significance. BSC imaging improved lesion contrast compared to B-mode and could classify FLL. Method #4 emerged as the most practical as it does not require anya prioriAC or segmentation.
More Related Videos
05:56Evaluation of the Feasibility, Safety, and Accuracy of an Intraoperative High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Liver Metastases
Published on: January 9, 2019
08:54Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018