Pneumatic Balloon Dilation versus Heller's Myotomy in Pediatric Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marcella M Constante1, Kayla D Santos2, Letizia Corbi3

  • 1Prefeitura Municipal de Contagem, Department of General Surgery, Minas Gerais, Brazil, Contagem.

Insights

Heller's myotomy (HM) reduces reoperation and symptom recurrence in pediatric achalasia compared to pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD). PBD is linked to lower gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) risk, but evidence is limited.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Achalasia treatment in children lacks definitive comparative evidence.
  • Pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD) and Heller's myotomy (HM) are primary interventions.
  • Limited data exists from small observational studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze clinical outcomes of PBD versus HM in pediatric achalasia.
  • To compare reoperation, symptom recurrence, GERD, and complications.
  • To inform optimal treatment strategies for achalasia in children.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.
  • Inclusion of comparative studies on PBD and HM in patients under 18.
  • Random-effects models used to analyze outcomes from nine observational studies (317 patients).

Main Results:

  • Heller's myotomy (HM) showed significantly lower odds of reoperation (OR=11.01) and symptom recurrence (OR=8.00).
  • Pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD) was associated with a lower risk of GERD (OR=0.14).
  • No significant difference in perforation rates; heterogeneity noted in study designs and reporting.

Conclusions:

  • HM offers better long-term efficacy regarding recurrence and reoperation in pediatric achalasia.
  • PBD may be preferable for reducing GERD risk.
  • High-quality, prospective multicenter studies are essential due to current evidence limitations.