Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Robotic-Assisted Electrode Insertion for Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: A Multicenter Study.

Nathan R Lindquist1,2, Laura C Holbert3, Camille C Dunn4

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

The Laryngoscope
|June 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prospective longitudinal observational study at an academic medical centre of lifestyle and cognition in older adults with a cochlear implant or hearing aid: study protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia Resulting in Acute Vestibular Paroxysmia and Hemifacial Spasm.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

Identifying High-Risk Children Safe for Same-Day Discharge After Tonsillectomy.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Implications of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery: A Review.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same author

Assessment of Surgical Salvage Outcomes for Exposed Cranial Neuromodulating Devices.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same author

Psychosocial and behavioral correlates of persistent pain post disease-modifying treatment change in rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-month cohort study.

Advances in rheumatology (London, England)·2026
Same journal

What Is the Most Effective Management of Congenital Cytomegalovirus-Related Hearing Loss?

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same journal

Awake Blue Light vs. KTP Laser Treatment for Vocal Fold Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same journal

Post-Operative Infection in Rhinoplasty With Autologous Versus Cadaveric Costal Cartilage Grafting.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same journal

Pregabalin Efficacy in Treatment of Chronic Neurogenic Cough.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same journal

Open Bedside Surgical Tracheostomy: A Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Advantages.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same journal

A Novel Descriptive Framework for Petroclival and Temporal Bone Meningioma Surgical Outcomes.

The Laryngoscope·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Robotic-assisted cochlear implantation in children aged 4-12 is safe and effective. This system demonstrated high success rates with no device-related serious adverse events, offering potential to reduce intracochlear trauma.

Area of Science:

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medical Robotics
  • Pediatric Surgery

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation is a vital treatment for pediatric hearing loss.
  • Minimizing intracochlear trauma during electrode insertion is crucial for long-term outcomes.
  • Pediatric anatomy presents unique challenges for surgical procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the safety and usability of a robotic-assisted electrode insertion system for pediatric cochlear implantation.
  • To evaluate the incidence of device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) in children aged 4-12 years.
  • To determine the procedural success and efficiency of robotic assistance in this population.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study involving 14 pediatric patients (4-12 years).
Keywords:
cochlear implantcochlear implantationpediatricrobotic‐assisted electrode array insertionsoft surgery

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

  • Unilateral cochlear implantation using a robotic-assisted electrode array insertion system.
  • Primary outcome: device-related SAEs within 30 days post-activation; Secondary outcomes: insertion success, time, speed, and electrode position.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful robotic-assisted electrode insertion in all 14 patients.
    • No device-related SAEs occurred within 30 days post-activation; all 7 reported adverse events were non-device related.
    • Surgeons reported high success rates (93%) for device setup, use, and detachment, managing pediatric anatomic variations effectively.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic-assisted cochlear implant electrode insertion is safe and effective in pediatric patients (4-12 years) across multiple centers.
    • The system achieved high procedural success rates without device-related SAEs.
    • Adapting to pediatric anatomical constraints is key for safe robotic-assisted cochlear implantation, with potential to minimize intracochlear trauma.