Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
Occupational radiation doses in CT-guided interventions: A multicentre evaluation with special emphasis on lung
Hemmo Hartikainen1, Antti Pekkarinen2, Touko Kaasalainen3
1HUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Medical Physics, The Wellbeing Services County of Kymenlaakso, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotkantie 41, 48210 Kotka, Finland; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Finland.
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate eye lens and whole-body radiation doses received by interventional radiologists during CT-guided procedures, with a particular focus on lung biopsies.
Methods:
Simultaneous measurements of eye lens dose equivalent Hp(3), deep-dose equivalent Hp(10), and shallow-dose equivalent Hp(0.07) were conducted under clinical conditions during CT-guided procedures in five Finnish hospitals during four separate four-week measurement periods. Hp(3) was measured using EYE-D thermoluminescent dosimeters, while Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) were recorded using DIS-1 dosimeters. The Hp(3)/Hp(10) and Hp(3)/Hp(0.07) ratios, and Hp(3) to dose-length product (DLP) were analysed to assess whether routinely measured quantities can provide a rough indication of eye lens dose in CT-guided procedures. The doses per CT procedure were analysed for all aforementioned dose equivalents to evaluate the annual exposures. Dosimeter calibration and quality control were performed at a secondary standard dosimetry laboratory. Staff positioning, radiation protection practices, and procedural variables were explored in relation to differences in observed exposure levels across hospitals and procedures.
Results And Conclusions:
Occupational radiation exposure during CT-guided procedures were generally negligible when appropriate radiological practices and protective equipment were used. One hospital showed significantly higher dose values due to the primary use of fluoroscopy and absence of a lead glass screen. Despite this aberrant result, exposure levels remained below annual occupational dose limits in all hospitals. Routinely measured Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) showed a strong relationship with Hp(3) in the measurable dose data, suggesting that they may provide a rough indication of the order of magnitude of eye lens dose.
