Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

09:09
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Photoacoustic device fingerprints induce bias in deep learning models
Christoph J Bender1,2, Marcel Knopp3,4, Niklas Holzwarth3,4
1Division of Intelligent Medical Systems (IMSY), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. christophjulien.bender@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
Scientific Reports
|June 13, 2026
Summary
Deep learning models in photoacoustic imaging (PAI) can be biased by hardware differences between devices. This study reveals that PAI device fingerprints can lead to inaccurate disease diagnosis, highlighting the need for bias evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Deep learning (DL) models excel in established medical imaging but struggle with emerging modalities like photoacoustic imaging (PAI) due to data sparsity and bias.
- Hardware-induced bias in PAI is an unexplored challenge, risking multicentric deployment failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct the first multicentric analysis of hardware-induced bias in photoacoustic imaging.
- To investigate how device-specific characteristics affect DL model performance in PAI.
- To evaluate the impact of device-health correlations on diagnostic accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed device-specific characteristics from four PAI device instances across two peripheral artery disease studies.
- Trained DL models to classify device origin and diagnose disease under varying device-health correlations.
- Assessed the ability of DL models to detect device-specific fingerprints.
Main Results:
- Identified unique 'fingerprints' embedded in PAI images from different device instances.
- Achieved high accuracy in DL-based device detection using these fingerprints.
- Demonstrated that DL models exploit device signatures as shortcuts when device and health status are correlated, leading to biased predictions.
Conclusions:
- Overlooking hardware-induced bias in PAI can lead to overestimated algorithm performance and clinically misleading results.
- Emphasizes the critical need for bias evaluation and explainable AI methods in PAI research.
- Facilitates the development of robust and reliable DL models for multicentric photoacoustic imaging studies.