Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies
Published on: August 25, 2018
Predicting nicotine emissions and plasma nicotine boost in E-cigarette users using machine learning
Simanta Roy1, Sreshtha Chowdhury1, Tarana Ferdous1
1Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, AHC 5, 4th Floor, Office 480, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Abstract:
As e-cigarette use continues to rise globally, the need for reliable and scalable methods to quantify nicotine exposure in e-cigarette users has become more crucial. This study aims to develop supervised machine learning (ML) models that predict nicotine emission and plasma nicotine boost based on puff topography, personal and device characteristics, and e-liquid consumption. This study analyzed 259 measurements from e-cigarette users aged 21-35 years by combining human puff topography data with laboratory toxicant emission tests generated through validated playback procedures. Puffing behavior was recorded during ad libitum vaping sessions and replicated with a puffing robot (playback) to measure nicotine emissions. Plasma nicotine levels were determined via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Six supervised regression models, including ordinary least squares, lasso, random forest, XGBoost, support vector regression, and neural networks, were trained to predict nicotine emissions and plasma nicotine boost from puffing parameters. The models were evaluated using an 80/20 train, test split with bootstrap resampling over 200 iterations, with performance metrics assessed by R², RMSE, and MAE. Among the ML methods evaluated, XGBoost consistently demonstrated the best performance (highest R², minimal RMSE, and MAE) for predicting both nicotine emissions and plasma nicotine boost. For nicotine emission prediction, XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy using either puff number (R² = 0.778 ± 0.153) or liquid consumption (R² = 0.747 ± 0.149) in combination with average puff duration and device characteristics (nicotine concentration and device). Using these emission estimates together with individual characteristics (age, sex, height, and weight), XGBoost-based plasma nicotine boost models showed the best explanatory performances for both puff-based (R² = 0.613 ± 0.174) and liquid-consumption-based (R² = 0.699 ± 0.168) predictors. This study shows that ML methods can effectively estimate nicotine emissions and plasma nicotine boost exposure directly from puffing behavior and device features. These models can support product regulation, assess addiction risk, and facilitate population-level surveillance.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05205382, NCT05338801).
More Related Videos
09:30A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
Published on: January 18, 2018
10:44Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Stimulants
Ganglionic stimulants activate NM nicotinic receptors in autonomic ganglia, falling into two categories: nicotine mimetics [e.g., lobeline, dimethylpiperazine, tetramethylammonium] and muscarinic receptor agonists [e.g., muscarine, methacholine]. The first category's action is rapid and blocked by nicotinic receptor antagonists, while the second category's action is delayed and blocked by atropine-like agents. Nicotine, an alkaloid, affects the heart rate by stimulating sympathetic or...
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data