Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
Published on: April 18, 2025
Cervical cancer screening policy inequality worldwide: a systematic review of disparities in access and
Ruijun Xin1,2, Meixi Gong1,2, Jiaqi Guo1
1Department of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, No.44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110001, China.
Background:
The rising global burden of cervical cancer and persistent inequalities in screening access underscore the need to strengthen implementation. Therefore, we compiled the cervical cancer screening guidelines from different countries/regions and evaluated their implementation status and coverage situation.
Methods:
In this study, we conducted comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases (from their establishment to February 1, 2025), websites and the World Health Organization (WHO) database. Studies included in our analysis provide detailed information on the official cervical cancer screening recommendations for each country. All indicators were stratified based on factors such as human development index (HDI), income level, geographical location, WHO regions, disease risk, and age. The systematic review was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251087263).
Results:
Our study incorporated data from 77 countries/regions, only 62.3% (48/77) of them provided the year of published/updated protocol. Cytology was the primary screening test in 62 (80.5%) of 77 countries. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) was the most recommended test in low HDI countries. Relatively few countries had adopted Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a primary screening method. Screening coverage was associated with HDI/income (low HDI: 12.43% vs. very high HDI: 49.74%; high-income: 51.68% vs. low income and middle-income countries [LMICs]:34.45%), with high-risk regions (29.88%) significantly lower than other areas (46.76%). Age-stratified analysis showed minimal coverage in the 20-29 and 70-79 groups, while coverage peaked in the 30-39 group. Our results also showed substantial heterogeneity in screening quality indicators (positive rate, further assessment rate, detection rate, and positive predictive value [PPV]) due to factors such as differences in the HDI.
Conclusions:
This study highlights global inequities in cervical cancer screening guidelines, particularly in the transition of screening methods among different countries/regions. Global cervical cancer coverage remains significantly below the target of 70%. Accelerate screening strategies, improve screening-diagnosis-treatment accessibility, establish monitoring systems, and strengthen global cooperation.
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
Preventive Healthcare Services