Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Statewide Universal School Meals Policies and Food Insecurity: Difference-in-Differences Analysis
Kelsey L Kinderknecht1, Eric B Rimm1,2, S Bryn Austin3,4
1Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Universal school meals (USM) policies may reduce household food insecurity for families with school-aged children. This study found decreases in food insecurity for higher-income households and some low-middle income households under USM.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Nutrition Policy
- Socioeconomic Determinants of Health
Background:
- The National School Lunch and Breakfast Program aims to combat food insecurity but requires payment for some children.
- Universal school meals (USM) policies offer free meals to all students, regardless of income.
- The impact of USM on food insecurity, especially for students who would otherwise pay, requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the association between statewide universal school meals (USM) policies and household and child food insecurity.
- To analyze these associations across different household income levels.
Main Methods:
- A difference-in-differences study design was employed.
- Utilized a nationally representative sample of US households with children aged 6-17 years (2012-2021, 2023-2024).
- Compared food insecurity outcomes in states maintaining USM policies after 2022 against those that did not, stratifying by household income.
Main Results:
- Households with the highest incomes in USM states saw reduced household and child food insecurity.
- Low-middle income households in USM states experienced reduced household food insecurity.
- Lowest income households saw reduced child food insecurity, though this finding requires caution due to potential assumption violations.
Conclusions:
- Statewide universal school meals (USM) policies are associated with decreased household food insecurity.
- USM policies demonstrate potential benefits across various income strata, particularly for higher-income households and child food insecurity in the lowest income bracket.
- Further research may be needed to fully understand the nuances of USM impact across all income levels and to address potential methodological limitations.
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Cross-Sectional Research
Metabolic States of the Body: Fasting and Starvation
One-Way ANOVA