Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Flexible Survival Extrapolation with Blended Hazards: Accounting for Treatment Effect Waning in Health Technology Assessment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

A Microsimulation Model for Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the United States: Michigan Model for Diabetes-Chronic Kidney Disease Model.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Statin Adherence: A Historical Cohort Study.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Mind the Gap: Impact of New Labels on Public Perceptions and Calculated Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Melanoma In Situ Diagnosis-A Secondary Analysis of an Online Randomized Experiment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

A Metamodel-Based General-Purpose Autocalibration Tool for Simulation Models.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

The Dutch Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Decision Aid in Clinical Practice: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Taste Or Scale? Methodological Approach To Health Preferences Comparison Across Groups.
  1. Home
  3. Taste Or Scale? Methodological Approach To Health Preferences Comparison Across Groups.

Related Experiment Video

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test
07:10

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test

Published on: August 17, 2018

Taste or Scale? Methodological Approach to Health Preferences Comparison across Groups.

Solomon Tarfasa Faro1

  • 1From the Independent Researcher, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
|June 15, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers can now better compare health preferences across groups by accounting for decision consistency, not just true differences. This study shows adjusting for scale heterogeneity improves discrete choice experiment validity and reduces bias.

Keywords:
Poe et al. testSwait and Louviere testWTPdiscrete choice experimentshealth preferences comparisonscale heterogeneity

More Related Videos

Psychophysical Tracking Method to Measure Taste Preferences in Children and Adults
09:17

Psychophysical Tracking Method to Measure Taste Preferences in Children and Adults

Published on: July 16, 2016

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test
07:10

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test

Published on: August 17, 2018

Psychophysical Tracking Method to Measure Taste Preferences in Children and Adults
09:17

Psychophysical Tracking Method to Measure Taste Preferences in Children and Adults

Published on: July 16, 2016

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Behavioral economics
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are widely used to assess health preferences across subgroups.
  • Observed utility differences may stem from variations in decision consistency rather than true preference differences.
  • Methodological transparency in accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in DCEs is lacking, necessitating robust approaches for credible subgroup comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To improve health preference research methods by directly addressing scale heterogeneity in DCEs.
  • To reduce bias when comparing subgroups in health preference research.
  • To distinguish between scale heterogeneity and true preference differences across groups.

Main Methods:

  • A simulated discrete choice experiment (DCE) evaluated hypothetical cancer treatments for patients and caregivers.
  • Mixed logit models were estimated, with scale heterogeneity addressed using the Swait-Louviere 2-step procedure.
  • Willingness to pay (WTP) was computed and compared across groups using a simulation-based test.

    • Main Results:

    • The Swait-Louviere test confirmed significant scale heterogeneity but no meaningful taste differences between groups.
    • After accounting for scale effects, a shared preference structure was observed, with variability driven by decision inconsistency.
    • No statistically significant between-group differences in willingness to pay (WTP) were found, indicating no meaningful subgroup contrasts.

    Conclusions:

    • Adjusting for scale heterogeneity enhances DCE validity by reducing bias and enabling accurate subgroup comparisons.
    • The study demonstrated that heterogeneity often reflects scale rather than true preference differences, with negligible WTP gaps.
    • Routine scale diagnostics and preference tests under equalized scale are recommended for valid inference in stated-preference research.