Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Cardiac Rehabilitation for Angina with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Scoping Review
Dinah L van Schalkwijk1,2, Mariëlle J Hartzema-Meijer1, Peter Damman1
1Department of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is safe and improves patient-reported outcomes like quality of life. However, evidence is fragmented, necessitating standardized, patient-centered models for this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) significantly impacts quality of life.
- Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) presents a potential non-pharmacological treatment for ANOCA patients.
- Existing literature on CR for ANOCA requires comprehensive mapping.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) interventions for patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA).
- To identify CR program components, delivery methods, reported outcomes, and research gaps in the ANOCA population.
Main Methods:
- Adherence to PRISMA-ScR guidelines for the scoping review.
- Comprehensive search of seven electronic databases up to September 30, 2025.
- Descriptive synthesis of data from 26 included studies, using TIDieR checklist and socio-ecological model for qualitative findings.
Main Results:
- CR interventions for ANOCA were safe, well-tolerated, with high adherence.
- Significant improvements were observed in patient-reported outcomes, including angina symptoms, quality of life, and psychological well-being.
- Exercise training and psychosocial therapies were common, but findings on physiological outcomes were heterogeneous, with noted variability and limitations in studies.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is safe and acceptable for ANOCA patients, yielding meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes.
- Current evidence is fragmented, highlighting the need for standardized, patient-centered CR models.
- Further long-term research is essential to optimize care and guide clinical practice for this underserved group.
Aims:
Angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is associated with impaired quality of life, and cardiac rehabilitation (CR) may be a promising non-pharmacological treatment option. This scoping review aimed to map how cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with ANOCA is described in the literature, including program components, delivery characteristics, reported outcomes, and research gaps.
Methods And Results:
A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search of seven electronic databases was performed from inception to September 30, 2025. Studies reporting CR interventions in adults with ANOCA or related endotypes were included. Data were charted using the TIDieR checklist and synthesized descriptively. Qualitative findings were organized using a socio-ecological model. Methodological quality was assessed descriptively using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The database search yielded 14,072 records, of which 26 studies were included. CR interventions were generally safe and well tolerated, with high adherence rates. Patient-reported outcomes consistently improved, particularly angina symptoms, quality of life, and psychological well-being, while effects on physiological outcomes were heterogeneous. Exercise training was the most common intervention component, often individualized and combined with psychosocial therapies. Qualitative findings highlighted unmet needs related to education, psychological support, validation, and flexible, tailored program delivery. Substantial variability and methodological limitations were observed across studies.
Conclusions:
CR for patients with ANOCA appears safe, acceptable, and associated with meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes; however, evidence remains fragmented. Standardized, patient-centered CR models and long-term research are needed to optimize care and inform clinical practice for this underserved population.
Related Concept Videos
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina I: Introduction

