Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones (ViMAS): A Pilot Study
Published on: March 14, 2017
Smartphone-based abdominal inclination angles for assessing abdominal obesity: Convergent validity and reliability
Younghyun Kwon1, Sueryun Seo1, Kyuenam Park1
1Digital Healthcare and Sports Data Science Lab, Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Background:
Abdominal obesity is associated with increased cardiometabolic risk, highlighting the need for regular monitoring. However, tape-based waist circumference measurements may be inconvenient for repeated self-monitoring and do not readily support digital recording. Given the widespread availability of smartphones, measuring abdominal inclination angles using a smartphone inclinometer (SI) may be a practical option for assessing abdominal obesity.
Objectives:
This study aimed to investigate the convergent validity and reliability of SI-derived abdominal inclination angles obtained through examiner- and self-measurements among participants with obesity types ranging from normal weight to type II obesity.
Methods:
Forty adults underwent abdominal inclination angle measurements using SI. Examiner- and self-measured upper abdomen (UA), lower abdomen (LA), and total abdomen (TA) angles were obtained. Convergent validity was evaluated using Spearman correlations with anthropometric indices. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, Bland-Altman analysis, and regression analysis for proportional bias and heteroscedasticity.
Results:
Self-measured UA and TA angles showed stronger validity with anthropometric indices than examiner measurements. UA and TA angles demonstrated good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, while inter-rater reliability was moderate. Bland-Altman analyses showed no proportional bias, although heteroscedasticity was observed in self-LA for intra-rater comparisons and in self-UA and self-LA for inter-rater comparisons.
Conclusions:
SI measurements of abdominal inclination angles demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability, with consistent performance for UA and TA angles, whereas LA measurements showed greater variability and should be interpreted with caution. This method may provide a practical approach for monitoring abdominal obesity in daily life.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
