Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Evaluating comorbidity scoring systems for flumatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: a machine learning and
Yuanlan Yang1, Yujun Li2, Jishi Wang1
1Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Background:
Comorbidities increasingly complicate targeted therapy for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). This study evaluated three comorbidity scoring systems (CCI, ACE-27, and CIRS-G) to predict molecular responses in flumatinib-treated CP-CML patients.
Methods:
Retrospective data from 559 patients (2018-2024) were analyzed. Machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, were trained to predict 12-month major molecular response (MMR). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to interpret non-linear associations and feature interactions.
Results:
The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.852). Integrating CIRS-G into the baseline clinical model provided the most substantial incremental value (ΔAUC = 0.078, p = 0.006), outperforming CCI and ACE-27. SHAP analysis revealed a non-linear threshold effect, suggesting that a CIRS-G score ≥ 8 may severely compromise therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, interaction plots indicated an exploratory model-based association where advanced age and severe comorbidity clustered with lower predicted probabilities, while reduced dose interventions coincided with altered model predictions in this specific subpopulation.
Conclusion:
CIRS-G showed the strongest incremental predictive value among the evaluated comorbidity scores in this single-center cohort. Machine learning and SHAP analysis provide exploratory insights for individualized risk stratification, though the reported predictive performance may overestimate prospective validity due to temporal variations and retrospective design.
