Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An irradiation-free platform for localized skull bone marrow manipulation to dissect the skull-brain axis.

Journal of neuroinflammation·2026
Same author

USP13-mediated stabilization of FOXD1 activates aerobic glycolysis to drive osteogenic differentiation and mitigate osteoporosis.

Biochemical pharmacology·2026
Same author

Association between uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) and osteoporosis in type 2 diabetes with MASLD.

Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same author

Targeting MEF2A suppresses microglial hyperactivation and synaptic phagocytosis to attenuate epilepsy pathogenesis.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

m<sup>6</sup>A RNA modification guides alternative polyadenylation to maintain T cell quiescence.

Science advances·2026
Same author

The complement system in Alzheimer's disease: mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic implications.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same journal

Epidemiological Characteristics and Genotype Distribution of Human Papillomavirus Among Women of Different Ethnic Groups in the Yili Region: A Retrospective Study of 13,915 Women.

International journal of women's health·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Urobiome and Urine pH in Women with or without Overactive Bladder Symptoms.

International journal of women's health·2026
Same journal

Patient Selection Metrics and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

International journal of women's health·2026
Same journal

Effect of an Educational Intervention on Reducing Mistreatment in Gynecology and Obstetrics Services in Guinea: A Client-Reported Before-After Study.

International journal of women's health·2026
Same journal

Global Burden of Ovarian Cancer and Causal Risk Factors from 1990 to 2021: An Integrated GBD and Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

International journal of women's health·2026
Same journal

The Landscape of Disulfidptosis in Preeclampsia Reveals a Novel 5-Gene Diagnostic Signature via Machine Learning.

International journal of women's health·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Calibrated and Explainable CIN2+ Risk Stratification Using Routine Clinical Data: Development and External

Yuzhang Wu1,2, Aihong Wang3

  • 1Department of Telecommunications Engineering and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

International Journal of Women'S Health
|June 15, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new machine learning model accurately predicts cervical precancer (CIN2+) risk using routine clinical data. This explainable model aids in identifying women needing closer evaluation, improving colposcopy triage.

Keywords:
CIN2+SHAPcalibrationcervical precancerdecision curve analysisexternal validationrisk stratification

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening relies on detecting precancerous lesions (CIN2+).
  • Accurate risk stratification is crucial for effective colposcopy triage.
  • Existing models may lack explainability or external validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Develop and validate a calibrated, explainable risk-stratification model for CIN2+.
  • Utilize routine structured clinical data for broad applicability.
  • Compare machine learning algorithms for optimal performance.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study with development (879 women) and external validation (103 women) cohorts.
  • Included 12 routine variables: demographics, HPV, cytology, colposcopy.
  • Compared Logistic Regression, LightGBM, and XGBoost using cross-validation; XGBoost selected after calibration and threshold optimization.

Main Results:

  • Calibrated XGBoost model achieved AUROC 0.720 (internal) and 0.679 (external).
  • SHAP analysis identified cytology grade, HPV16, high-risk HPV, colposcopy impression, transformation zone, and age as key predictors.
  • Model demonstrated clinical interpretability and supportive validation.

Conclusions:

  • A calibrated machine learning workflow using routine data provides interpretable CIN2+ risk estimates.
  • This model supports risk-based colposcopy triage, identifying women needing closer evaluation.
  • The workflow offers a basis for prospective assessment and improved screening protocols.