Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Choices and options in the care procurement process of bundled payment contracts: A literature-based overview from a
Sander Steenhuis1, Jeroen van der Wolk2, Eric van der Hijden1,3
1Department of Health Sciences, Health Economics Section, Talma Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Context:
While the potential of bundled payment models to facilitate value-based care is hard to overestimate, the complexity of designing an effective and feasible care procurement contract forms a formidable barrier to their use. The objective of this study is to identify, structure, and interpret the key design choices and options during the care procurement process of bundled payment contracts using a payer's perspective.
Methods:
Two reviewers independently conducted an iterative qualitative content analysis of a selectively sampled set of articles from a prior scoping review. First, they extracted and clustered all text excerpts about design choices or options relevant to a bundled payment procurement process. Where available, they assessed the potential impact of choosing that option. Second, the choices and options were analytically organized into six phases of a care procurement process. Third, the resulting framework was evaluated in an external expert panel session.
Findings:
33 design choices with 110 unique options were identified and structured within a framework. An example of a design choice is to 'determine the method to select care and cost to include in the bundle,' in which case 4 options were identified: 1. based on historic claims data, 2. based on best-practices and/or local care pathways, 3. based on evidence-based clinical guidelines, and 4. based on the provider type or specialism that is willing to collaborate.
Conclusions:
This study helps understand how design choices for payers to purchase value-based care with bundled payment contracts are context-dependent (e.g., in a single-payer system options are different than in a multi-payer system), interchangeable (i.e., different choices can achieve similar effects) and/or interrelated (i.e., choosing one option can have a positive or negative impact on the options in other procurement phases). The framework assists payers (and providers) in developing an effective and feasible bundled payment contract.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Patient-centered Care