Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments
Published on: August 8, 2019
Characterizing device-measured sleep in observational health research using compositional data analysis: a systematic
Christine W St Laurent1, Guilherme Moraes Balbim2, Denver M Y Brown3
1Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. cstlaurent@umass.edu.
This review found inconsistent reporting of device-measured sleep data in compositional data analysis (CoDA) studies. Standardizing sleep measurement and processing is crucial for accurate insights into movement behaviors and health.
Area of Science:
- Movement behavior science
- Public health research
- Data analysis methodologies
Background:
- Compositional data analysis (CoDA) is vital for understanding the interplay between movement behaviors (sedentary time, physical activity, sleep) and health.
- Existing reviews on CoDA reporting standards primarily focus on physical activity and sedentary behavior, neglecting the critical role of sleep data.
- Standardized reporting of sleep data is essential for advancing CoDA research in health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the measurement, processing, and reporting practices of device-based sleep data in studies employing CoDA.
- To identify inconsistencies and gaps in sleep data handling within CoDA research examining movement behaviors and health outcomes.
- To provide recommendations for improving the quality and comparability of sleep data in future CoDA studies.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a systematic literature search across seven databases, supplemented by citation tracking and expert consultation.
- Included observational studies published since 2015 that utilized CoDA with isometric log-ratio transformations and device-measured sleep data.
- Extracted data on sleep actigraphy measurement, processing, and reporting, referencing American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines, and assessed study quality using the NIH tool.
Main Results:
- Of 70 included studies, most reported limited sleep measurement and processing details.
- A significant majority (67 studies) incorporated only one sleep component into their time-use composition.
- Fewer than half (29 studies) acknowledged sleep-related limitations, with 10 studies rated as having poor quality.
Conclusions:
- Significant inconsistencies exist in how device-measured sleep data is measured, processed, and reported in CoDA studies.
- The variability in sleep data protocols underscores the urgent need for standardized approaches and transparent reporting.
- Future research must prioritize consistency and transparency to enhance the validity and comparability of findings on sleep within the 24-hour movement behavior framework for health.
Related Concept Videos
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Correlations
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Blind Procedures

