Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of diurnal versus nocturnal time-restricted eating on cardiometabolic health and circadian rhythm in healthy adults: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nutrition and health·2026
Same author

Biological Characterization of Mupirocin-KGF Hydrogel and Its Regenerative Potential in Human Fibroblast-Mediated Wound Healing.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

NeXus: An Automated Platform for Network Pharmacology and Multi-Method Enrichment Analysis.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists in managing MALFD: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BMC gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Alginate-Based Encapsulation Fabrication Technique for Drug Delivery: An Updated Review of Particle Type, Formulation Technique, Pharmaceutical Ingredient, and Targeted Delivery System.

Pharmaceutics·2024
Same author

CYP14 family in Caenorhabditis elegans: Mitochondrial function, detoxification, and lifespan.

Journal of applied toxicology : JAT·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

Systematic Multi-Target QSAR Benchmarking: Machine Learning Algorithms, Molecular Descriptors, and Validation.

Salah A Alshehade1, Ghazi Al Jabal2,3, Iqbal H Jebril4

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 22200 Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|June 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model generalizability depends on the target dataset, not algorithms. Applicability domain analysis is crucial for reliable QSAR predictions, especially for novel compounds.

More Related Videos

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Medicinal chemistry

Background:

  • Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is vital for computational drug discovery.
  • Understanding QSAR model generalizability across diverse chemical structures and protein targets is crucial but not fully understood.
  • This study benchmarks QSAR performance across four distinct ChEMBL targets: EGFR, DRD2, BACE-1, and hERG.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically benchmark 2D-QSAR model generalizability across diverse therapeutic targets.
  • To investigate the impact of scaffold-based splitting on interpolation-to-extrapolation performance.
  • To evaluate the role of applicability domain (AD) in QSAR model reliability and compare algorithm performance.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic 2D-QSAR benchmarking using scaffold-based splitting on 33,751 compounds across four ChEMBL targets.
  • Analysis of generalization gaps and prediction quality degradation outside the Tanimoto-based chemical domain.
  • Comparative performance evaluation of various algorithms, including Random Forest and graph convolutional networks, using ECFP4 fingerprints.

Main Results:

  • Target-dependent generalization gaps were observed, indicating dataset-specific performance penalties.
  • Applicability domain analysis revealed significant prediction quality drops for compounds outside the defined chemical space.
  • Tree-based ensemble methods, particularly Random Forest with ECFP4, consistently outperformed other algorithms, including a basic GCN.
  • Algorithm rankings were highly consistent across all tested protein families.

Conclusions:

  • QSAR model generalizability is influenced by dataset properties rather than algorithmic limitations alone.
  • Applicability domain reporting is an essential component for robust QSAR model evaluation.
  • Random Forest with ECFP4 fingerprints provides a reliable baseline for QSAR modeling across diverse targets.