Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
Discriminating papillary renal cell carcinoma from metanephric adenoma: a quantitative contrast-enhanced CT-based
Jie Zhan1, Ting Zhang2, Yuexi Wu3
1Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Background:
Metanephric adenoma (MA) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) demonstrate overlapping hypovascular appearances on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), yet reliable quantitative imaging criteria for their preoperative differentiation are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative parameters derived from multiphasic CECT for differentiating MA from pRCC.
Methods:
Ninety-three patients with pathologically confirmed renal tumors (MA, n = 31; pRCC, n = 62) were retrospectively included. CT attenuation values of renal tumors and the ipsilateral renal cortex were measured on unenhanced (UP), corticomedullary (CMP), and nephrographic (NP) phases in all 93 patients, and on the excretory (EP) phase in 84 patients (26 MA, 58 pRCC) as EP images were unavailable in the remaining nine patients. Multiple quantitative parameters were derived. After standardization, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors, and several multivariable diagnostic models were constructed and compared.
Results:
Univariable analysis demonstrated significant differences between pRCC and MA in age, sex, and multiple quantitative parameters derived from the NP and EP. Among these parameters, the absolute tumor enhancement difference between the excretory and unenhanced phases (EPT-UPT) showed the highest diagnostic performance [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.885, 95% CI 0.815-0.956]. In multivariable analysis, Model 1 (age, sex, NPT, EPT) yielded an AUC of 0.942. Model 2 (age, sex, NPT-UPT, EPT-UPT) achieved an AUC of 0.944. Model 3 (age, sex, NPT/C, EPT/C) demonstrated an AUC of 0.956. Model 4 (age, sex, rNPT/C, rEPT/C) achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.964. No statistically significant differences in AUC were observed among the four models (all p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
Quantitative CECT parameters, particularly those derived from the delayed phases (nephrographic and excretory)-including absolute tumor attenuation values, absolute tumor enhancement differences, absolute tumor-to-cortex ratios, and relative tumor-to-cortex ratios-demonstrate substantial potential for the noninvasive differentiation between MA and pRCC.
More Related Videos
12:22The Use of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA) to Explore Protein Expression Variation within Individual Renal Cell Cancers
Published on: January 22, 2013
05:36Comparing Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Established in Mouse Kidney and on Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane
Published on: February 8, 2020