Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
Immunohistochemistry for p16 and p53 Provides Substantial Agreement With Molecular Tests in Penile Cancer
Jan Hrudka1, Jan Hojný2, Eva Krkavcová2
1Department of Pathology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Abstract:
Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a rare cancer associated with a relatively poor prognosis. The WHO classifies pSCC into HPV-associated and HPV-independent subtypes, with HPV-positive pSCCs showing slightly better outcomes. A key negative prognostic marker is TP53 mutation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance of (1) p16 immunohistochemistry with HPV status determined by PCR, (2) p53 immunohistochemistry with TP53 mutational status obtained by NGS, and (3) prognostic impact of overexpression and null phenotype p53 immunohistochemistry profiles. Analyzing invasive pSCC from 209 patients, we assessed concordance between p16 immunohistochemistry and HPV status (n = 132) determined by quantitative PCR, obtaining Cohen's kappa Κ = 0.62 (p < 0.0001). For p53 immunohistochemistry versus TP53 status by NGS (n = 145), Cohen's kappa reached Κ = 0.693 (p < 0.0001). We found worse overall survival (Hazard ratio = 3.33, 95% CIs 1.92-5.56, p < 0.0001) in p53 mutated cases (n = 38, both overexpression and null phenotype) compared to wild type (n = 171), but without a significant difference between both mutated profiles. Both HPV status and p53 profile can be reliably assessed by immunohistochemistry with substantial agreement. Patients with a mutated p53 profile showed significantly worse survival, irrespective of the mutated profile variant.

