Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Standardized Induction and Assessment of Long-term Potentiation-like Cortical Plasticity Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: November 7, 2025
Stepwise intensity adjustment reduces false positives in transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring during
Tomohisa Hashimoto1, Koki Uno2, Teppei Suzuki2
1Department of Clinical Engineering, National Hospital Organization Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Insights
The Stepwise Adjustment Technique (SAT) for transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring in pediatric spine surgery significantly reduced false-positive alerts. This method improves diagnostic accuracy without sacrificing sensitivity, offering a practical approach for intraoperative assessment.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Spinal Surgery
- Neurophysiology
Background:
- Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring is crucial in pediatric spinal deformity surgery.
- High false-positive rates with fixed-intensity (FI) protocols can lead to unnecessary surgical interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if a Stepwise Adjustment Technique (SAT) improves the diagnostic performance of TcMEP monitoring compared to a fixed-intensity (FI) protocol.
- To reduce false-positive alerts during pediatric spinal deformity surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 881 pediatric patients undergoing spinal surgery (402 FI, 479 SAT).
- In the SAT protocol, TcMEP stimulation intensity was increased stepwise (up to 200 mA) if amplitude decreased by ≥80% to assess waveform recovery.
- Comparison of diagnostic performance and alert outcomes between FI and SAT protocols.
Main Results:
- Initial TcMEP decreases were similar between groups (FI: 27.1%, SAT: 27.3%).
- In the SAT group, 61.8% of initial decreases resolved with intensity adjustment, avoiding false-positive alerts.
- SAT demonstrated significantly higher specificity (0.97 vs. 0.74) than FI at closure, maintaining high sensitivity. Interrupted time-series analysis showed immediate improvement in the final ratio after SAT implementation (+11.41%, p=0.002).
Conclusions:
- The Stepwise Adjustment Technique (SAT) enhances TcMEP monitoring specificity in pediatric spine surgery by reducing false-positive alerts.
- SAT improves diagnostic accuracy without compromising sensitivity, offering a practical framework for repeated intraoperative assessment.
- Caution is advised in scenarios where stimulation threshold elevation is a critical warning sign.
Objective:
Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring during pediatric spinal deformity surgery has high false-positive (FP) rates. We evaluated whether a Stepwise Adjustment Technique (SAT) improves diagnostic performance compared with a fixed-intensity (FI) protocol.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 881 pediatric patients (FI, n = 402; SAT, n = 479). In the SAT protocol, when TcMEP amplitude decreased by ≥ 80%, stimulation intensity was increased stepwise up to 200 mA to assess waveform recovery. Diagnostic performance and alert outcomes were compared.
Results:
Initial TcMEP decreases were similar between groups (FI, 27.1% vs. SAT, 27.3%). In the SAT group, 61.8% (81/131) of decreases resolved after intensity adjustment and were not adjudicated as TcMEP alerts. For the final amplitude ratio at closure, SAT showed higher specificity than FI (0.97 vs. 0.74) while maintaining high sensitivity. Interrupted time-series analysis showed an immediate improvement in the final ratio after SAT implementation (+11.41%, p = 0.002).
Conclusions:
In pediatric spine surgery, SAT improved TcMEP specificity by reducing false-positive alerts without compromising sensitivity. Although this approach may be particularly useful in spine surgery, caution is warranted where stimulation-threshold elevation is considered an important warning sign.
Significance:
SAT provides a practical framework for repeated TcMEP assessment during spine surgery.
More Related Videos
10:27A Standardized Protocol for Functional Motor Mapping Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 27, 2026
12:13Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025