Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Drug Clearance and Dosing During CytoSorb Hemoadsorption: A Systematic Review.

Critical care explorations·2026
Same author

Courtship vocalizations of male mice do not always attract females.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

[Ferenc Markhot and the history of the medical faculty in Eger, parallel with the University of Nagyszombat].

Orvosi hetilap·2026
Same author

Impact of extracorporeal circuits on systemic drug levels - a scoping review.

Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care·2026
Same author

The International, Prospective COSMOS (CytOSorb® TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS) Registry: Interim Results in Patients with Septic Shock.

Annals of intensive care·2026
Same author

The international, prospective COSMOS (CytOSorb® TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS) Registry: results from the first 300 patients.

Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs
08:44

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs

Published on: May 9, 2017

Bioacoustic processing and analyses of mouse vocalizations: Current methods and future directions.

Reyhaneh Abbasi1, Doris Nicolakis2, Maria Adelaide Marconi2

  • 1Acoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wiesingerstrasse 4, Vienna A-1010, Austria; Vienna Doctoral School of Cognition, Behaviour and Neuroscience, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Behavioural Brain Research
|June 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This review explores bioacoustic tools for analyzing mouse vocalizations, focusing on improving data processing and classification methods. It highlights challenges and proposes solutions for studying rodent communication.

Keywords:
Acoustic communicationError propagationGeneralizabilityHouse miceSignal processingUSV classificationUltrasonic vocalizations

More Related Videos

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication
10:28

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs
08:44

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs

Published on: May 9, 2017

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication
10:28

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication

Published on: June 5, 2016

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Bioacoustics
  • Animal Communication
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Rodents, including house mice (Mus musculus), use sonic and ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) for communication, but their functions remain largely unknown.
  • Analyzing audio recordings of these vocalizations presents significant challenges in data processing and interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of current bioacoustic tools for processing and analyzing mouse vocalizations.
  • To identify and address challenges in the data processing pipeline, from audio recording to USV classification and sequencing.
  • To propose solutions and a hierarchical framework for future research in rodent acoustic communication.

Main Methods:

  • Review of conventional and alternative methods for audio file processing, including time-frequency representations and mouse-adapted techniques.
  • Comparison of machine learning and signal processing approaches for automated USV detection, denoising, and feature extraction.
  • Evaluation of supervised and unsupervised classification methods, alongside manual validation, for analyzing USVs and sequencing approaches.

Main Results:

  • Identified critical steps in the bioacoustic data processing pipeline where errors can propagate.
  • Highlighted the need for improved denoising, frequency contour tracking, and feature extraction methods.
  • Emphasized the importance of reliable manual methods as a gold standard for validating automated machine learning approaches.

Conclusions:

  • Current bioacoustic tools require refinement to accurately capture and analyze mouse vocalizations.
  • Developing robust automated methods, validated by manual approaches, is crucial for advancing the study of rodent communication.
  • Addressing technological challenges will enable deeper insights into the functions of USVs in house mice.