Related Experiment Videos
Perspective: Machine Learning for Health Should Consider Social Drivers of Health
1Department of Computer Science, Stanford University School of Engineering.
Abstract:
Clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms can exacerbate a wide range of injustices across multiple domains and levels of society. These harms are often underemphasized and differentially distributed, with minoritized communities disproportionately experiencing the harms and not the benefits of health ML algorithms. By proposing a correspondence between prominent algorithmic harm and social drivers of health (SDOH) frameworks, we show that a range of algorithmic harms ultimately impact human health through SDOH factors, especially structural factors. This presents an inherent tension in the development of ML for health, where the harms of algorithms may lead to the worsening of health inequities. We recommend the consideration of SDOH throughout the pipeline of ML system development for examining algorithmic harms to health. Effectively considering SDOH necessitates developing competencies in structural analysis and community-engaged approaches. Accounting for SDOH could illuminate pathways toward equity-promoting algorithms, although we highlight that, in many cases, an equity-promoting algorithm may not exist. Thus, we also emphasize the need for interventions on the root causes of health inequities.
Insights
Clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms can worsen health inequities, disproportionately harming minoritized communities. Addressing social drivers of health (SDOH) in ML development is crucial for promoting equity, though root causes require broader interventions.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Health Equity Research
Background:
- Clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms can perpetuate societal injustices.
- Disparities exist in the distribution of harms and benefits of health ML, with minoritized groups often bearing the brunt.
- Algorithmic harms in healthcare are frequently underemphasized and inadequately addressed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the relationship between algorithmic harms and social drivers of health (SDOH).
- To highlight the tension between ML development in health and the potential to exacerbate health inequities.
- To propose strategies for mitigating algorithmic harms and promoting health equity through ML.
Main Methods:
- Framework analysis correlating algorithmic harm typologies with social drivers of health (SDOH) concepts.
- Examination of how algorithmic harms impact human health via SDOH factors, particularly structural determinants.
- Literature review on existing approaches to algorithmic bias and health equity.
Main Results:
- Algorithmic harms impact health primarily through social drivers of health (SDOH), especially structural factors.
- The development of ML for health inherently risks worsening existing health inequities.
- A significant tension exists between the goals of ML in health and the imperative to reduce health disparities.
Conclusions:
- Integrating SDOH considerations throughout the ML development pipeline is essential for identifying and addressing algorithmic harms.
- Developing expertise in structural analysis and community-engaged methodologies is necessary for effectively considering SDOH.
- While SDOH can guide the creation of more equitable algorithms, interventions targeting the root causes of health inequities are paramount, as equitable algorithms may not always be feasible.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Concepts of Health and Illness
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...