Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Analysis of Human T Cell Activity in an Allogeneic Co-Culture Setting of Pre-Treated Tumor Cells
Published on: March 7, 2025
Cytokine release syndrome in solid tumours: mechanism-based therapeutic strategies for prevention and management
Federico Monaca1,2, Rachel Woodford3, Kroopa Joshi4
1Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Abstract:
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) represents a spectrum of immune hyperactivation initiated by rapid T-cell engagement and amplified through innate immune cells, particularly monocytes and macrophages, with downstream cytokine cascades driving endothelial dysfunction, capillary leak and organ impairment. CRS is a frequent, class-associated toxicity of T-cell-engaging immunotherapies and is being observed with increasing regularity as T-cell-redirecting therapies progress through clinical development in solid tumours. Although CRS is typically less severe in patients with solid tumours relative to those with haematological malignancies, phase II-III trials of these emerging agents consistently report grade 1-2 CRS in the majority of patients, highlighting the need for effective prevention and management strategies, while preserving anti-tumour activity of the primary therapy. Current grading and management algorithms have been largely extrapolated from experience with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and rely on step-up dosing, premedication, supportive care and escalation to interleukin (IL)-6/IL-6R blockade and corticosteroids. However, steroid-refractory or high-grade CRS, as well as overlapping syndromes underscore the limitations of this approach and the need for mechanism-based interventions targeting upstream mediators and signalling hubs. These include IL-1 blockade, Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription inhibition, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor neutralisation, tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibition and interferon gamma blockade. In this narrative review, we synthesise the mechanistic rationale and emerging clinical evidence underpinning CRS prevention and management in solid tumours, with a particular focus on T-cell engager (TCE) and other T-cell-redirecting therapies. We then outline key risk-mitigation strategies and discuss their potential implications for anti-tumour immunity. Finally, we highlight key knowledge gaps, particularly the paucity of prospective solid tumour-specific data, with current CRS prevention and management strategies therefore remaining largely extrapolated from haematological malignancies, alongside the need for biomarker-driven risk stratification, optimal sequencing and prophylactic strategies and the development of next-generation TCE designs.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cytotoxic T Cells-mediated Immune Response
Immunological surveillance is the ability of immune cells to monitor and eliminate infected cells with intracellular pathogens, neoplastically transformed cells, and cells with non-self antigens. Cytotoxic T cells and NK...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
The Tumor Microenvironment

