Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Standardization of Basket Use in Sialendoscopy: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study
Published on: June 6, 2025
Access to specialized outpatiecare: an analysis of regulation in Brazilian settings
Thais Barros Zanette da Silva1, Jozinélio Severino Teixeira2, Carlos Amilcar Salgado2
1Universidade do Distrito Federal. Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Objective:
To analyze how different subnational governments, based on common national guidelines, have developed their own models for regulating access to specialized care, with varying degrees of innovation, institutionalization, and integration of telehealth.
Method:
A descriptive and exploratory study with a qualitative approach that comparatively analyzes the implementation of regulations governing access to specialized care. Data were collected through document analysis, literature review, and, in some cases, interviews with key stakeholders, consolidated into detailed descriptions of each scenario to form the research corpus. Analysis was conducted using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Experiences were selected from the municipalities of Curitiba (PR), Belo Horizonte (MG), Porto Alegre (RS), and São Paulo (SP), as well as the states of Ceará, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, and the Federal District.
Results:
The eight Brazilian experiences with outpatient regulation are characterized by diversity in organizational models, degrees of institutionalization of teleconsultation, and integration across levels of care. The adoption of technologies, access regulation protocols, and computerized systems varied across locations, influenced by structural, regulatory, and contextual factors. When integrated, teleconsultation improved the quality of referrals and increased problem-solving capacity in primary care, but its implementation remains uneven across the country.
Conclusion:
The implementation of access regulation to specialized care in the Unified Health System varied according to institutional, organizational, and technological capacities. Weaknesses were identified in the integration of health information systems in the organization and delivery of specialized care, with structural inequalities; in governance, with low standardization of protocols; limited integration between Primary Health Care and specialized care; and professional resistance to change. Regions with better outcomes integrated teleconsultation into outpatient regulation; clinical and access protocols adopted health information systems integrated with analytical intelligence resources and institutionalized regulatory guidelines. The CFIR highlighted the influence of contexts, actors, and processes, reinforcing the importance of national guidelines for improving local organizations.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Global Regulatory Systems
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Standards of Care I
