Intravascular lithotripsy for coral reef aortic stenosis: a case series assessing feasibility, hemodynamic effects,

Marios Platon Dimopoulos1,2, Maria Papageorgiou3, Georgios Nistikoulis4,3

  • 1Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, 26504, Greece. dimopoylos.platonas@gmail.com.

CVIR Endovascular
|June 17, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) offers a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for severe calcified aortic stenosis. This approach improves blood flow and may reduce the need for stenting in high-risk patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Vascular Surgery

Background:

  • Coral reef aorta (CRA) involves calcified plaques obstructing the aorta, with open surgery posing high risks.
  • Endovascular techniques, like intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), present less invasive options for treating aortic stenosis.
  • High-risk patients often face significant morbidity with traditional surgical interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility, safety, and hemodynamic effects of IVL guided by FFR in treating calcified aortic stenosis.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of IVL in modifying calcified aortic plaques and restoring hemodynamic flow.
  • To determine if IVL combined with FFR can reduce the need for stent implantation.

Main Methods:

  • A case series of three patients with severe calcified abdominal aortic stenosis was conducted.
  • Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was employed under fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance.
  • Pre- and post-procedural FFR measurements were utilized to assess hemodynamic significance and treatment outcomes.

Main Results:

  • All IVL procedures were technically successful, with significant FFR improvements post-treatment.
  • IVL effectively modified calcified plaques, achieving adequate luminal gain in most cases without stenting.
  • One patient experienced an aortic dissection, managed successfully with stent placement.
  • Follow-up showed sustained clinical improvement and vessel patency up to 12 months.

Conclusions:

  • IVL combined with FFR is a feasible and effective minimally invasive strategy for managing heavily calcified aortic lesions.
  • This combined approach allows for both plaque modification and objective physiological assessment.
  • The IVL-FFR strategy shows potential for reducing stent implantation in treating calcified aortic stenosis.