Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Three-dimensional correction of cubitus varus deformity using patient-specific 3D-printed osteotomy guides
Mei-Ren Zhang1,2, Xiao Zeng1, Jiang-Long Guo1,2
1Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, ZhuHai Hospital, Orthopedics Trauma Department, ZhuHai, Guangdong, China.
Background:
Various three-dimensional (3D) corrective osteotomy techniques have been reported for the treatment of cubitus varus deformity. However, achieving accurate correction through a limited lateral incision remains technically challenging. This study introduces a method for accurate 3D osteotomy of cubitus varus deformity using a limited lateral incision.
Methods:
Five patients (2 males and 3 females) with cubitus varus deformity following supracondylar fracture underwent 3D corrective osteotomy using 3D-printed, patient-specific osteotomy templates, along with custom location and reduction guides, between August 2022 and January 2025. These cases were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical outcomes assessed included pre- and postoperative carrying angles, operative time, elbow joint function, intraoperative blood loss, degree of osteotomy, time to bone union, and postoperative complications.
Results:
The mean carrying angle on the affected side improved significantly from -15.74° ± 6.58° (varus) preoperatively to 7.77° ± 3.94° (valgus) postoperatively. The mean tilting angle improved from 54.8° ± 7.40° to 51.4° ± 2.33°. Elbow range of motion normalized in all patients, with a mean increase in flexion angle of 24° ± 8° (range: 15°-35°). Hyperextension of the elbow and internal rotation of the shoulder were also corrected. Bone union was achieved at a mean of 2.6 ± 0.49 months (range: 2-3 months). The average operative time was 139.6 ± 22.26 min (range: 116-175 min), and mean intraoperative blood loss was 42 ± 31.87 mL (range: 10-100 mL). The mean correction angle achieved through osteotomy was 23.51° ± 8.79° (range: 12.43°-33.43°). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), all five patients achieved excellent outcomes at the final follow-up (mean: 21.6 ± 4.8 months), with no reports of poor results, recurrence of varus deformity, or wound-related complications. One patient exhibited transient ulnar nerve symptoms postoperatively. No patients reported prominence of the lateral humerus.
Conclusion:
The use of a 3D-printed, patient-specific osteotomy guide combined with custom location and reduction templates enables safe, accurate, and reproducible 3D correction of cubitus varus deformity through a small lateral incision. This surgical technique, grounded in 3D computer simulation, reduces variability between surgeons and may represent a viable therapeutic option for the correction of cubitus varus deformity.
