Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

06:46
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Investigating the mechanisms underlying saccade generation in the frontal eye fields using multisite microstimulation
Richard Johnston1, Roma O Konecky1, Husam A Katnani2
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Journal of Neurophysiology
|June 18, 2026
Summary
Electrical microstimulation of the frontal eye field (FEF) in monkeys reveals how current intensity affects saccade direction and amplitude. A novel polar average model better predicts dual-site stimulation effects on saccades.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Oculomotor Research
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- The frontal eye field (FEF) is crucial for controlling eye movements, with electrical microstimulation reliably evoking saccades.
- Understanding how microstimulation parameters influence saccades and how FEF population activity is decoded remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of microstimulation parameters on evoked saccades in the FEF.
- To compare different models for predicting saccade characteristics during dual-site FEF stimulation.
- To explore how the brain integrates FEF information for saccadic planning.
Main Methods:
- Used a 16-channel microelectrode array for microstimulation in the FEF of awake, behaving monkeys.
- Varied current intensities and stimulation sites (single vs. dual contacts).
- Developed and tested a polar average model against traditional vector sum and average models using FEF and superior colliculus (SC) data.
Main Results:
- Higher current intensities were needed to alter saccade direction compared to amplitude during single-site FEF stimulation.
- The polar average model outperformed traditional models in predicting both amplitude and direction of dual-site saccades.
- In the SC, the polar average model improved saccade amplitude prediction but not direction prediction.
- Model accuracy for unequal dual-site stimulation depended on individual site saccade amplitudes, suggesting flexible integration of FEF information.
Conclusions:
- Saccade direction and amplitude are differentially affected by FEF microstimulation intensity.
- A polar average model offers a more accurate framework for understanding FEF population activity readout for saccade generation.
- The brain appears to flexibly combine saccadic amplitude and direction information from the FEF for motor planning.
